首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >An eye-movement exploration into return-sweep targeting during reading
【2h】

An eye-movement exploration into return-sweep targeting during reading

机译:阅读过程中回扫目标的眼动研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Return-sweeps are an essential eye-movement that takes the readers’ eyes from the end of one line of text to the start of the next. While return-sweeps are common during normal reading, the eye-movement literature is dominated by single-line reading studies where no return-sweeps are needed. The present experiment was designed to explore what readers are targeting with their return-sweeps. Participants read two short stories by Frank L. Baum while their eye-movements were being recorded. In one story, every line-initial word was highlighted by formatting it in bold, while the other story was presented normally (i.e., without any bolding). The bolding manipulation significantly reduced oculomotor error associated with return-sweeps, as these saccades landed closer to the left margin and were less likely to require corrective saccades compared to the control condition. However, despite this reduction in oculomotor error, the bolding had no influence on local fixation durations or global reading-time measures. Moreover, return-sweep landing sites were not impacted by line-initial word length nor did the effect of bolding interact with the length of the line-initial word, suggesting that readers were not targeting the centre of line-initial words. We discuss the implication of these findings for return-sweep targeting and eye-movement control during reading.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-019-01742-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:回扫是一种必不可少的动作,它使读者的眼睛从一行文本的末尾到下一行的开头。虽然在正常阅读期间回返扫描很常见,但单行阅读研究主导了眼动文献,在这些研究中,不需要回返扫描。本实验旨在探究读者对他们的回报扫描的针对性。参与者在记录他们的眼动时阅读了Frank L. Baum的两个短篇小说。在一个故事中,每个行首单词都以加粗格式突出显示,而另一故事则正常显示(即不加粗)。大胆的操作显着减少了与返掠相关的动眼运动误差,因为这些扫视着陆的位置更靠近左侧边缘,与对照条件相比,它们需要矫正扫视的可能性较小。但是,尽管眼动误差减少了,但粗体化对局部注视时间或整体读取时间没有影响。此外,回程扫描的着陆点不受行首字长的影响,粗体效果也不受行首字长的影响,这表明读者没有将目标对准行首字的中心。我们讨论了这些发现对阅读过程中回扫目标和眼睛运动控制的含义。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.3758 / s13414-019-01742-3)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号