首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >From welfare states to welfare sectors: Explaining sectoral differences in occupational pensions with economic and political power of employees
【2h】

From welfare states to welfare sectors: Explaining sectoral differences in occupational pensions with economic and political power of employees

机译:从福利国家到福利部门:用雇员的经济和政治权力解释职业养老金的部门差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Studies analysing welfare have previously focused on countries as units. In the course of pension cuts and the increasing importance of occupational welfare, our traditional understanding of a homogeneous welfare state is being challenged. In this article, I distinguish between both economic individual power (employee skills) and political collective power (trade unions), and their relation with different occupational pensions. A combined analysis by both factors is not common, where employee skills and power resources are traditionally treated as separate, rival explanations of public welfare. Combining the ‘method of difference’ with the ‘method of agreement’, the article first presents the within-country variety of occupational pensions in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and Denmark. Occupational pensions in the same economic sectors across countries are then used as the units of analysis in order to illustrate the plausible determinants of economic individual power and political collective power.
机译:分析福利的研究以前集中于国家作为单位。在削减养老金和提高职业福利的重要性的过程中,我们对同质福利国家的传统理解受到了挑战。在本文中,我将区分经济个人权力(员工技能)和政治集体权力(工会),以及它们与不同职业养老金的关系。这两种因素的综合分析并不普遍,传统上将员工的技能和能力资源视为对公共福利的相互独立的解释。本文将“差异方法”与“协议方法”结合起来,首先介绍了德国,意大利,英国和丹麦在国内的各种职业养老金。然后,将各国在同一经济部门中的职业养老金用作分析单位,以说明经济个人权力和政治集体权力的合理决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号