首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect
【2h】

Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect

机译:关于不连贯性和不连系权的论述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Taking the “right to disconnect” discussion as a starting point, this article considers how the im/possibility of “opting out” is ruminated in scholarly discourses on technology non-use, media resistance, and media disruption. I argue that while very different in scope, these discourses converge in that they all revolve around a structuring paradox. On one hand, this paradox is set in place by the paradox of dis/connectivity itself (no disconnectivity without connectivity). On the other hand, I argue, it is incited and reinforced by the use of scholarly methods that appear to be at odds with the gesture of disconnectivity itself, whether they be empirical, discursive, or technical (or legislative). This article stakes a claim for the importance looking at these discourses on dis/connectivity from the point of view of this structuring paradox, for it is here, I argue, that the limits of our current “culture of connectivity” are most forcefully negotiated.
机译:本文以“断开连接权”的讨论为出发点,考虑了在关于技术不使用,媒体抵制和媒体破坏的学术论述中如何“选择退出”的可能性/可能性。我认为,尽管这些讨论的范围截然不同,但它们的融合之处在于它们都围绕着结构性悖论展开。一方面,这种悖论是由dis / connectivity本身的悖论所确立的(没有连通性就没有连通性)。另一方面,我认为,它被学术方法的使用所激发和加强,这些方法似乎与不连贯性本身的姿态不符,无论它们是经验性,话语性还是技术性(或立法性)。本文主张从这种结构性悖论的角度来看这些关于离散性/连通性的论述的重要性,因为我认为,在这里,我们当前“连通性文化”的局限性是最有力的协商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号