首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Fail a What-Where-When Task but Find Rewards by Using a Location-Based Association Strategy
【2h】

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Fail a What-Where-When Task but Find Rewards by Using a Location-Based Association Strategy

机译:黑猩猩(盘尾类动物)无法完成“何时何地”任务,但可以使用基于位置的关联策略来寻找奖励

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recollecting the what-where-when of an episode, or episodic-like memory, has been established in corvids and rodents. In humans, a linkage between remembering the past and imagining the future has been recognised. While chimpanzees can plan for the future, their episodic-like memory has hardly been investigated. We tested chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with an adapted food-caching paradigm. They observed the baiting of two locations amongst four and chose one after a given delay (15 min, 1 h or 5 h). We used two combinations of food types, a preferred and a less preferred food that disappeared at different rates. The subjects had to base their choices on the time elapsed since baiting, and on their memory of which food was where. They could recover either their preferred food or the one that remained present. All animals failed to obtain the preferred or present foods above chance levels. They were like-wise unsuccessful at choosing baited cups above chance levels. The subjects, thus, failed to use any feature of the baiting events to guide their choices. Nonetheless, their choices were not random, but the result of a developed location-based association strategy. Choices in the second half of the study correlated with the rewards obtained at each location in the first half of the study, independent from the choices made for each location in the first half of the study. This simple location-based strategy yielded a fair amount of food. The animals' failure to remember the what-where-when in the presented set-up may be due to the complexity of the task, rather than an inability to form episodic-like memories, as they even failed to remember what was where after 15 minutes.
机译:已经确定了在狼和啮齿类动物中回忆事件发作的时间或类似情节的记忆。在人类中,人们已经意识到记住过去和想象未来之间的联系。尽管黑猩猩可以为未来做计划,但几乎没有研究过它们类似发作的记忆。我们使用适应性食物缓存范例测试了黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)。他们观察了四个地点中两个地点的诱饵,并在给定的延迟时间(15分钟,1小时或5小时)后选择了一个地点。我们使用了两种食物类型组合,一种以不同的速度消失的优先食物和次要食物。受试者必须根据自诱饵以来经过的时间以及他们对哪种食物的记忆来做出选择。他们可以找回自己喜欢的食物或仍然存在的食物。所有动物均未能获得高于或低于机会水平的偏爱食品。他们同样没有成功选择高于机会水平的诱饵杯。因此,受试者没有利用诱饵事件的任何特征来指导他们的选择。尽管如此,他们的选择不是随机的,而是发达的基于位置的关联策略的结果。研究的后半部分的选择与研究上半部分在每个位置获得的奖励相关,而与研究上半部分中每个位置所做的选择无关。这种简单的基于位置的策略产生了大量的食物。动物无法记住所呈现设置中的什么地方可能是由于任务的复杂性,而不是无法形成情景式的记忆,因为它们甚至都无法记住15岁后的情景分钟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号