首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NPG Open Access >Optimal duration of risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy to mood stabilizer following remission of a manic episode: A CANMAT randomized double-blind trial
【2h】

Optimal duration of risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy to mood stabilizer following remission of a manic episode: A CANMAT randomized double-blind trial

机译:躁狂发作缓解后利培酮或奥氮平对情绪稳定剂的辅助治疗的最佳持续时间:一项CANMAT随机双盲试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Atypical antipsychotic adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate is effective in treating acute mania. Although continuation of atypical antipsychotic adjunctive therapy after mania remission reduces relapse of mood episodes, the optimal duration is unknown. As many atypical antipsychotics cause weight gain and metabolic syndrome, they should not be continued unless the benefits outweigh the risks. This 52-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial recruited patients with bipolar I disorder (n=159) who recently remitted from a manic episode during treatment with risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate. Patients were randomized to one of three conditions: discontinuation of risperidone or olanzapine and substitution with placebo at (i) entry (‘0-weeks' group) or (ii) at 24 weeks after entry (‘24-weeks' group) or (iii) continuation of risperidone or olanzapine for the full duration of the study (‘52-weeks' group). The primary outcome measure was time to relapse of any mood episode. Compared with the 0-weeks group, the time to any mood episode was significantly longer in the 24-weeks group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 0.86) and nearly so in the 52-weeks group (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.39, 1.02). The relapse rate was similar in the 52-weeks group compared with the 24-weeks group (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.99); however, sub-group analysis showed discordant results between the two antipsychotics (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.17; 1.32 olanzapine patients; HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.00, 3.41 risperidone patients). Average weight gain was 3.2 kg in the 52-weeks group compared with a weight loss of 0.2 kg in the 0-weeks and 0.1 kg in the 24-weeks groups. These findings suggest that risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy for 24 weeks is beneficial but continuation of risperidone beyond this period does not reduce the risk of relapse. Whether continuation of olanzapine beyond this period reduces relapse risk remains unclear but the potential benefit needs to be weighed against an increased risk of weight gain.
机译:锂或丙戊酸盐的非典型抗精神病辅助疗法可有效治疗急性躁狂症。尽管躁狂症缓解后继续进行非典型抗精神病辅助治疗可以减少情绪发作的复发,但最佳持续时间尚不清楚。由于许多非典型抗精神病药会导致体重增加和代谢综合症,因此,除非益处大于风险,否则不应继续使用它们。这项为期52周的双盲安慰剂对照试验招募了患有双相性I型障碍(n = 159)的患者,这些患者最近在使用利培酮或奥氮平辅助疗法治疗锂或丙戊酸盐期间因躁狂发作缓解。患者被随机分为以下三种情况之一:停用利培酮或奥氮平,并在(i)进入(“ 0周”组)或(ii)进入后24周(“ 24周”组)或( iii)在整个研究过程中继续使用利培酮或奥氮平(“ 52周”组)。主要结果指标是任何情绪发作复发的时间。与0周组相比,在24周组中,出现任何情绪事件的时间都明显更长(危险比(HR)0.53; 95%置信区间(CI):0.33、0.86),而在52周组中几乎如此周组(HR:0.63; 95%CI:0.39,1.02)。 52周组的复发率与24周组相似(HR:1.18; 95%CI:0.71、1.99);但是,亚组分析显示两种抗精神病药之间的结果不一致(HR:0.48,95%CI:0.17;奥氮平患者; HR:1.85,95%CI:1.00,利培酮患者)。 52周组的平均体重增加为3.2 kg,而0周组的平均体重减轻为0.2μkg,24周组的平均体重减轻为0.1μkg。这些发现表明,利培酮或奥氮平辅助治疗24周是有益的,但在此期间继续使用利培酮不会降低复发的风险。奥氮平持续超过这一时期是否会降低复发风险尚不清楚,但潜在的益处需要权衡体重增加的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号