首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >Comparison of clot-based and chromogenic assay for the determination of protein c activity
【2h】

Comparison of clot-based and chromogenic assay for the determination of protein c activity

机译:基于凝块和生色测定法测定蛋白c活性的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Activated protein C inactivates factor Va and VIIIa. Deficiency of this natural anticoagulant may result in recurrent venous thrombosis. Performance characteristics of clot-based and chromogenic protein C activity assays are different. The clot-based assay has limitations because of interference with coagulation inhibitors resulting in spuriously increased protein C levels or underestimation because of elevated levels of factor VIII and Factor V-Leiden mutation. The chromogenic assay is not influenced by such interferences but only detects functional defects of protein C that involve the active site rendering it insensitive to rare mutations. To compare two methods, we conducted a retrospective study from January 2015 to June 2017. Our results showed a good correlation between clot-based and chromogenic assay (R = 0.94 and r2 = 0.88). The study of agreement between the two methods by the Bland–Altman method showed that chromogenic method on an average measures 7.8% more protein C than that of clot-based. The results also showed that the bias between the two methods is significant. The positive trend noted was contributed by the values of less than 20% of protein C. Both clot-based and chromogenic assays had high sensitivity; however, the chromogenic assay showed better specificity (97%) as compared with the clot-based assay (93%). In conclusion, we recommend the chromogenic method as the assay of choice, which is also recommended by the College of American Pathologist Consensus Study over activated partial thromboplastin time-based assay. We have shown here that despite a good correlation between the two techniques, there is a difference as highlighted by the difference plots.
机译:活化的蛋白C使Va和VIIIa因子失活。缺乏这种天然抗凝剂可能会导致静脉血栓复发。基于凝块和生色蛋白C活性测定的性能特征是不同的。基于凝块的测定法存在局限性,因为它与凝血抑制剂的干扰导致蛋白质C水平的虚假增加,或者由于VIII因子和V因子-Leiden突变水平的升高而被低估。生色测定不受此类干扰的影响,仅检测蛋白C的功能缺陷,该缺陷涉及活性位点,从而使其对稀有突变不敏感。为了比较这两种方法,我们从2015年1月至2017年6月进行了一项回顾性研究。我们的结果显示,基于凝块的检测与生色检测之间具有良好的相关性(R = 0.94和r 2 = 0.88)。通过Bland–Altman方法对这两种方法之间的一致性进行的研究表明,发色方法平均比基于血块的方法测得的蛋白质C高7.8%。结果还表明,两种方法之间的偏差很大。指出的积极趋势是由不到20%的C蛋白值贡献的。基于凝块的检测和发色检测均具有很高的灵敏度。然而,与基于凝块的分析(93%)相比,生色分析显示出更好的特异性(97%)。总之,我们建议使用生色法作为选择的检测方法,美国病理学家共识研究还建议对激活的部分凝血活酶时间为基础的检测方法进行选择。我们已经在这里表明,尽管这两种技术之间具有良好的相关性,但差异图突出显示了差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号