首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B >An index method to evaluate growers’ pesticide use for identifying on-farm innovations and effective alternative pest management strategies: a case study of winegrape in Madera County California
【2h】

An index method to evaluate growers’ pesticide use for identifying on-farm innovations and effective alternative pest management strategies: a case study of winegrape in Madera County California

机译:一种评估种植者使用农药的指标方法以确定农场创新和有效的替代病虫害管理策略:以加利福尼亚州马德拉县的葡萄柚为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Winegrape is an important perennial crop in California, USA. Each year California winegrape farming consumes about 20 million kilograms of pesticides that have been a pollutant source to the fresh water systems of the state. The variation of pesticide use among winegrape growers has been significant. It has been observed that some growers have developed effective ways to reduce pesticide use, yet control pests efficiently to ensure harvest. Identification of the growers with low and high pesticide use is very helpful to extension programs that aim on reducing pesticide environmental risk. In this study, an index approach is proposed to quantitatively measure pesticide use intensity at grower level. An integrated pesticide use index is developed by taking pesticide quantity and toxicity into account. An additive formula and a multiplying formula were used to calculate the pesticide use index, i.e., PUI and PUIM. It was found that both PUI and PUIM were capable of identifying the low and high pesticide users while PUI was slightly more conservative than PUIM. All pesticides used in California winegrape farming were taken into account for calculating the indices. Madera County, one of the largest winegrape producers in California, was taken as an example to test the proposed approach. In year 2000, among the total 208 winegrape growers, 28 with PUI≤10 and 34 with 10<PUI≤20 were identified as low pesticide users who were characterized with both low quantity and low toxicity of pesticide use. Most of the growers had small-sized vineyards, i.e., one field and small planted areas. Furthermore, they had very low pesticide use intensity, used only 1–2 types of pesticides (mainly fungicides), applied few pesticides (1–3 only), and emphasized the use of low toxicity compounds. Meanwhile, 19 growers with PUI>60, identified as high pesticide users, had large-sized vineyards, i.e., more fields and large planted areas. They used all types of pesticides and many compounds, which indicated that their pest controls heavily depended on pesticides rather than on-farm management. Through the case study, the proposed approach proved to be useful for analyzing the growers’ pesticide use intensities and interpreting their pesticide use behaviors, which led to a new start point for further investigation of searching ways to reduce pesticide environmental risk.
机译:Winegrape是美国加利福尼亚州重要的多年生作物。加利福尼亚州的葡萄种植业每年消耗约2000万公斤农药,这些农药已成为该州淡水系统的污染物源。葡萄种植者之间农药使用的差异很大。据观察,一些种植者已经开发出有效的方法来减少农药的使用,同时有效地控制害虫以确保收割。确定低农药用量和高农药用量的种植者对旨在减少农药环境风险的推广计划非常有帮助。在这项研究中,提出了一种指数方法来定量测量种植者水平上的农药使用强度。综合农药使用指数是通过考虑农药的数量和毒性来制定的。使用添加剂公式​​和乘法公式来计算农药使用指数,即PUI和PUIM。结果发现,PUI和PUIM都能识别农药的高低使用者,而PUI比PUIM更为保守。计算该指数时,应考虑到加利福尼亚葡萄种植中使用的所有农药。以加利福尼亚州最大的葡萄酿酒生产商之一马德拉县为例,对所提出的方法进行了测试。 2000年,在总共208个葡萄种植者中,PUI≤10的葡萄种植者有28个,PUI≤20的葡萄种植者有34个,其农药使用量低且毒性低的特点是农药使用率低。大多数种植者都拥有小型葡萄园,即一个田地和小的种植区。此外,他们的农药使用强度非常低,仅使用1-2种农药(主要是杀真菌剂),很少使用农药(仅1-3种),并强调使用低毒化合物。同时,有19个PUI> 60的种植者被认为是高农药使用者,他们拥有大型的葡萄园,即更多的田地和大面积的种植区。他们使用了所有类型的农药和许多化合物,这表明其对害虫的控制在很大程度上取决于农药而不是农场管理。通过案例研究,所提出的方法被证明对分析种植者的农药使用强度和解释其农药使用行为是有用的,这为进一步研究寻找降低农药环境风险的方法提供了新的起点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号