首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Physical Therapy Science >Characteristics of coping strategies and the relationships between copingstrategies and stress reactions in physical therapy students during clinicalpractice
【2h】

Characteristics of coping strategies and the relationships between copingstrategies and stress reactions in physical therapy students during clinicalpractice

机译:应对策略的特点以及应对之间的关​​系物理治疗学生临床过程中的策略和压力反应实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Purpose] The aim of the present study was to understand the coping strategies used during physical therapy clinical practice. [Subjects and Methods] Sixty-eight of 77 physical therapy students (88.3%) responded to questionnaires, including a tri-axial coping scale and a scale of stress reactions after clinical practice (median age=22 years; 45 were male, 23 were female; 37 third-year students, 31 fourth-year students). The scores of males and females were compared via descriptive statistics. In addition, stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed. Dummy variables were created based on the median scores of stress reactions (0=slight reactions; 1=severe reactions), and were used as the dependent variables. [Results] The stress reaction scores of female (median score=7 points) were significantly higher than those of male students (5 points). The following significant logistic regression equation was obtained: log (p / (1−p))=1.78 + 1.96 [gender (0=male; 1=female)] + 0.30 (buck passing strategy). The odds ratios for gender and buck passing were 7.12 and 1.34, respectively. [Conclusion] Clinical practice educators should be aware that female students and those that use buck passing are more likely to suffer from severe stress reactions during physical therapy clinical practice.
机译:[目的]本研究的目的是了解物理疗法临床实践中使用的应对策略。 [对象与方法] 77名理疗专业学生中有68名(88.3%)回答了问卷,包括三轴应对量表和临床实践后的应激反应量表(中位年龄= 22岁;男性45岁,23岁女; 37名三年级学生,31名四年级学生)。男性和女性的得分通过描述性统计进行比较。另外,进行了逐步逻辑回归分析。根据压力反应的中位数创建虚拟变量(0 =轻度反应; 1 =严重反应),并将其用作因变量。 [结果]女学生的应激反应得分(中位数为7分)明显高于男学生的应激反应得分(5分)。获得以下显着的逻辑回归方程:log(p /(1-p))= 1.78 + 1.96 [性别(0 =男性; 1 =女性)] + 0.30(逆转策略)。性别和不及格的赔率分别为7.12和1.34。 [结论]临床实践教育者应意识到,在物理疗法临床实践中,女学生和那些采用降压式训练的学生更有可能遭受严重的压力反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号