首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society >An in vitro investigation to compare the surface roughness of auto glazed reglazed and chair side polished surfaces of Ivoclar and Vita feldspathic porcelain
【2h】

An in vitro investigation to compare the surface roughness of auto glazed reglazed and chair side polished surfaces of Ivoclar and Vita feldspathic porcelain

机译:进行体外研究以比较Ivoclar和Vita长石瓷的自动上釉再釉面和椅子侧面抛光表面的表面粗糙度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The change in surface roughness after different surface finishing techniques has attracted the attention of several prosthodontists regarding wear of opposing teeth or restorative material and the strength; plaque retention and appearance of the restoration. However, there is considerable controversy concerning the best methods to achieve the smoothest and strongest porcelain restorations after chair side clinical adjustments. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the average surface roughness of a self-glazed surface, a chair side polished surface and a reglazed surface of ceramic. Two feldspathic porcelain, namely VITA VMK94 (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sachingen, Germany) and IVOCLAR CLASSIC (Vivadent AG, FL-9494 Schaan, Liechtenstein) were selected to fabricate 20 specimens of each in the shape of shade guide tabs. A medium-grit diamond rotary cutting instrument was used to remove the glaze layer, and then the surface of half the specimens were re-glazed and the other half were polished using a well-defined sequence of polishing comprising of: Shofu porcelain polishing system, White gloss disc/polishing wheel, Silicone cone with diamond polishing paste and finally with small buff wheel with pumice slurry. The surface roughness (Ra) (μm) of the specimens was evaluated using a profilometer and scanning electron microscope. The data were statistically analyzed by using Student’s t test. The results had shown that there is no statistically significant difference both quantitatively and qualitatively, between the surface roughness of reglazed and chair-side polished surface. In addition, both reglazed and chair-side polished surfaces are better than the autoglazed surface. Within all the groups, there is no significant difference between companies. Polishing an adjusted porcelain surface with the suggested sequence of polishing will lead to a finish similar to a re-glazed surface. Therefore chair-side polishing can be a good alternative to reglazing for finishing adjusted porcelain surface.
机译:在使用不同的表面处理技术后,表面粗糙度的变化已经引起了数位修复医生的关注,它们涉及对置牙齿或修复材料的磨损以及强度。斑块保留和修复体的外观。但是,关于在椅子侧进行临床调整后获得最光滑,最坚固的瓷器修复体的最佳方法,存在很多争议。这项体外研究的目的是比较陶瓷的自釉面,椅子侧面抛光面和再釉面的平均表面粗糙度。选择了两种长石瓷,分别是VITA VMK94(德国Bad Sachingen的Vita Zahnfabrik)和IVOCLAR CLASSIC(列支敦士登的Vivadent AG,FL-9494 Schaan),以阴影引导片的形式制作了20个标本。使用中粒度金刚石旋转切割仪去除釉层,然后将试样的一半表面重新上釉,另一半使用定义明确的抛光顺序抛光,包括:Shofu瓷抛光系统,白色光泽圆盘/抛光轮,带有金刚石抛光膏的硅锥,最后是带有浮石浆料的小抛光轮。使用轮廓仪和扫描电子显微镜评估样品的表面粗糙度(Ra)(μm)。使用学生t检验对数据进行统计分析。结果表明,釉面和椅子侧抛光表面的表面粗糙度在数量和质量上都没有统计学上的显着差异。另外,再釉面和椅子侧面的抛光表面都比自动釉面更好。在所有组中,公司之间没有显着差异。按照建议的抛光顺序抛光调整过的瓷器表面将产生类似于重新上釉的表面的光洁度。因此,椅面抛光可以很好地替代上釉,以完成调整后的瓷器表面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号