首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Experimental Neuroscience >Comparison of Neurocognitive Testing and the Measurement of Marinobufagenin in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Report
【2h】

Comparison of Neurocognitive Testing and the Measurement of Marinobufagenin in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Report

机译:轻度创伤性脑损伤中神经认知测试与马力诺蟾毒精含量的比较:初步报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The evaluation of concussed athletes, including testing to determine if and when they may return to play, has become an important task of athletic trainers and team physicians. Currently, concussion protocols are in place, which depend largely upon assessments based upon neurocognitive testing (NCT). The authors have evaluated the use of a biomarker of brain trauma, marinobufagenin (MBG), and compared its application in concussed athletes with the performance of NTC. We found a disparity between these two testing procedures. In this communication, the findings of these comparative data are presented. We noted that athletes whose NCT evaluations had returned to baseline and who were allowed to again participate in play then showed a recurrence of elevated urinary MBG excretion. These observations raise concern as to the processes currently in effect with regard to the decision as to returning athletes to the full activity. They suggest a need for further evaluation.
机译:对脑震荡运动员的评估,包括确定他们是否以及何时可以重返比赛的测试,已成为体育教练和团队医师的重要任务。当前,脑震荡方案已经到位,这在很大程度上取决于基于神经认知测试(NCT)的评估。作者评估了脑外伤生物标志物marinobufagenin(MBG)的使用,并将其在脑震荡运动员中的应用与NTC的性能进行了比较。我们发现这两个测试过程之间存在差异。在本通讯中,将介绍这些比较数据的发现。我们注意到,其NCT评估返回到基线并被允许再次参加比赛的运动员随后表现出尿MBG排泄升高的复发。这些观察结果引起了人们对当前有关决定运动员重返全面比赛的过程的关注。他们建议需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号