首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Automatic Chemistry >Comparison of two data interpretation programs in automated blood cell counters
【2h】

Comparison of two data interpretation programs in automated blood cell counters

机译:自动血细胞计数器中两种数据解释程序的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two data interpretation programs incorporated into two different automated blood cell counters were evaluated. The programs analysed size distribution histograms for screening for abnormal specimens. The messages given by the programs were ‘normal’, ‘abnormal’ and ‘suspect’. ‘Abnormal’ messages meant abnormalities in the values of the measured parameters. ‘Suspect’ messages were given when the histograms showed either a possibility of the existence of abnormal blood cells, or an abnormal level of such cells; re-examination by a manual method was necessary for such specimens. For reference, the manual differential was done. The false-negative rate for each kind of message was less than 10% and efficiency was about 90%. These programs were helpful in avoiding unnecessary manual observations in reducing the workload in a routine clinical laboratory.
机译:对纳入两个不同的自动血细胞计数器的两个数据解释程序进行了评估。该程序分析了尺寸分布直方图,以筛查异常样本。程序发出的消息是“正常”,“异常”和“可疑”。 “异常”消息表示所测量的参数值异常。当直方图显示存在异常血细胞或异常血细胞水平时,就会发出“可疑”消息;对于此类标本,必须通过手动方法进行重新检查。作为参考,完成了手动差速器。每种消息的假阴性率均小于10%,效率约为90%。这些程序有助于避免不必要的手动观察,从而减少了常规临床实验室的工作量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号