首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >The Qualitative Descriptive Approach in International Comparative Studies: Using Online Qualitative Surveys
【2h】

The Qualitative Descriptive Approach in International Comparative Studies: Using Online Qualitative Surveys

机译:国际比较研究中的定性描述方法:使用在线定性调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

International comparative studies constitute a highly valuable contribution to public policy research. Analysing different policy designs offers not only a mean of knowing the phenomenon itself but also gives us insightful clues on how to improve existing practices. Although much of the work carried out in this realm relies on quantitative appraisal of the data contained in international databases or collected from institutional websites, countless topics may simply not be studied using this type of methodological design due to, for instance, the lack of reliable databases, sparse or diffuse sources of information, etc. Here then we discuss the use of the qualitative descriptive approach as a methodological tool to obtain data on how policies are structured. We propose the use of online qualitative surveys with key stakeholders from each relevant national context in order to retrieve the fundamental pieces of information on how a certain public policy is addressed there. Starting from Sandelowski’s seminal paper on qualitative descriptive studies, we conduct a theoretical reflection on the current methodological proposition. We argue that a researcher engaged in this endeavour acts like a composite-sketch artist collecting pieces of information from witnesses in order to draw a valid depiction of reality. Furthermore, we discuss the most relevant aspects involving sampling, data collection and data analysis in this context. Overall, this methodological design has a great potential for allowing researchers to expand the international analysis of public policies to topics hitherto little appraised from this perspective.
机译:国际比较研究对公共政策研究做出了非常宝贵的贡献。分析不同的政策设计不仅提供了一种了解现象本身的方式,而且还为我们提供了有关如何改进现有实践的深刻线索。尽管在此领域中进行的许多工作都依赖于对国际数据库中包含的数据或从机构网站收集的数据进行定量评估,但是由于例如缺乏可靠的信息,使用这种类型的方法设计可能无法研究无数的主题数据库,稀疏或分散的信息源等。在这里,我们讨论使用定性描述方法作为方法工具来获取有关政策结构的数据。我们建议与来自每个相关国家/地区的主要利益相关者一起使用在线定性调查,以检索有关如何解决特定公共政策的基本信息。从Sandelowski关于定性描述研究的开创性论文开始,我们对当前的方法论命题进行了理论反思。我们认为,从事这项工作的研究人员的行为就像一个复合素描艺术家,从证人那里收集信息,以便对现实进行描绘。此外,我们讨论了在这种情况下涉及采样,数据收集和数据分析的最相关方面。总体而言,这种方法设计具有巨大的潜力,可以使研究人员将对公共政策的国际分析扩展到迄今为止从这一角度很少被评估的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号