首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Indoor Air Contamination from Hazardous Waste Sites: Improving the Evidence Base for Decision-Making
【2h】

Indoor Air Contamination from Hazardous Waste Sites: Improving the Evidence Base for Decision-Making

机译:危险废物场所的室内空气污染:改进决策依据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

At hazardous waste sites, volatile chemicals can migrate through groundwater and soil into buildings, a process known as vapor intrusion. Due to increasing recognition of vapor intrusion as a potential indoor air pollution source, in 2015 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a new vapor intrusion guidance document. The guidance specifies two conditions for demonstrating that remediation is needed: (1) proof of a vapor intrusion pathway; and (2) evidence that human health risks exceed established thresholds (for example, one excess cancer among 10,000 exposed people). However, the guidance lacks details on methods for demonstrating these conditions. We review current evidence suggesting that monitoring and modeling approaches commonly employed at vapor intrusion sites do not adequately characterize long-term exposure and in many cases may underestimate risks. On the basis of this evidence, we recommend specific approaches to monitoring and modeling to account for these uncertainties. We propose a value of information approach to integrate the lines of evidence at a site and determine if more information is needed before deciding whether the two conditions specified in the vapor intrusion guidance are satisfied. To facilitate data collection and decision-making, we recommend a multi-directional community engagement strategy and consideration of environment justice concerns.
机译:在危险废物场所,挥发性化学物质可以通过地下水和土壤迁移到建筑物中,这一过程称为蒸气入侵。由于人们日益认识到蒸气入侵是潜在的室内空气污染源,因此美国环境保护署(EPA)在2015年发布了新的蒸气入侵指导文件。该指南指定了两个条件来证明需要补救:(1)蒸气侵入途径的证明; (2)有证据表明人类健康风险超过了既定的阈值(例如,在10,000例暴露人群中有一种癌症过多)。但是,该指南缺少有关证明这些条件的方法的详细信息。我们回顾了当前的证据,这些证据表明,通常在蒸汽入侵现场使用的监视和建模方法不能充分描述长期暴露的特征,并且在许多情况下可能低估了风险。基于这些证据,我们建议采用特定的方法进行监视和建模,以解决这些不确定性。我们提出一种信息方法的价值,以整合现场的证据线,并在确定是否满足蒸汽入侵指南中指定的两个条件之前,确定是否需要更多信息。为了促进数据收集和决策,我们建议采取多方向社区参与策略并考虑环境正义问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号