首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Implementation Science : IS >A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluation
【2h】

A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluation

机译:澳大利亚基础医疗保健中CVD风险管理的多方面质量改进干预措施:过程评估规程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite the widespread availability of evidence-based clinical guidelines and validated risk predication equations for prevention and management of CVD, their translation into routine practice is limited. We developed a multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management which incorporates electronic decision support, patient risk communication tools, computerised audit and feedback tools, and monthly, peer-ranked performance feedback via a web portal. The intervention was implemented in a cluster randomised controlled trial in 60 primary healthcare services in Australia. Overall, there were improvements in risk factor recording and in prescribing of recommended treatments among under-treated individuals, but it is unclear how this intervention was used in practice and what factors promoted or hindered its use. This information is necessary to optimise intervention impact and maximally implement it in a post-trial context. In this study protocol, we outline our methods to conduct a theory-based, process evaluation of the intervention. Our aims are to understand how, why, and for whom the intervention produced the observed outcomes and to develop effective strategies for translation and dissemination.
机译:背景技术心血管疾病(CVD)是世界范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。尽管基于证据的临床指南和经过验证的预防和管理CVD的风险预测方程式得到了广泛应用,但将其转化为常规做法仍然受到限制。我们针对CVD风险管理开发了多方面的质量改进措施,其中包括电子决策支持,患者风险沟通工具,计算机化的审计和反馈工具,以及通过门户网站按月,按同行排名的绩效反馈。这项干预措施是在澳大利亚的60项主要医疗服务的一项随机随机对照试验中实施的。总体而言,在未充分治疗的个体中,危险因素的记录和推荐治疗的处方都有改善,但是目前尚不清楚该干预措施如何在实践中使用以及哪些因素促进或阻碍了其使用。该信息对于优化干预措施的影响并在审判后的环境中最大程度地实施是必要的。在本研究方案中,我们概述了进行干预的基于理论的过程评估的方法。我们的目标是了解干预如何,为何以及为谁提供了观察到的结果,并制定有效的翻译和传播策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号