首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >No Job Demand Is an Island – Interaction Effects Between Emotional Demands and Other Types of Job Demands
【2h】

No Job Demand Is an Island – Interaction Effects Between Emotional Demands and Other Types of Job Demands

机译:没有工作需求是一个孤岛–情感需求与其他类型的工作需求之间的相互作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emotional demands are an inevitable feature of human services, and suggested to be a defining antecedent for workers’ stress and ill health. However, previous research indicate that emotional demands can have a favorably association to certain facets of human service workers’ motivation and well-being. Furthermore, recent research report that the effect of emotional demands on workers’ health and well-being seem to be contingent on the parallel level of other job demands. Still, initial investigations of interaction effects between emotional demands and other types of job demands have primarily focused on negative outcomes in terms of stress-related concerns and absenteeism. The present study investigated interaction effects between emotional demands and other types of job demands in relation to positive outcomes. In a larger sample of human service workers (social workers, n = 725), interaction effects were investigated between emotional demands and other job demands (quantitative demands, work pressure, and role conflict) for meaning in work and quality of work. Hypotheses stated that other job demands would moderate the relationship between emotional demands and positive outcomes, so that emotional demands would have a positive relation (i.e., act as a challenge) when the level of other demands is lower, but have a negative relation (i.e., act as a hindrance) when the level of other demands is high. Overall, the results provided support for the idea that emotional demands may act as a challenge. We found small but significant interaction effects between emotional demands and work pressure – in relation to meaning of work, as well as between emotional demands and quantitative demands, work pressure, and role-conflict, respectively – in relation to quality of work. Yet, the results did not support the assumption that emotional demands act as a hindrance when the level of other types of job demands is high. In sum, the results contribute by showing that emotional demands may promote human-service workers’ job attitudes when the level of parallel job demands is lower. We discuss the contribution of the study and the potential practical implications of the results, and give some suggestions for future research.
机译:情感需求是人类服务的必然特征,并被认为是工人承受压力和身体不适的先决条件。但是,先前的研究表明,情绪需求与人类服务工作者的动机和福祉的某些方面具有良好的联系。此外,最近的研究报告表明,情绪需求对工人健康和幸福的影响似乎取决于其他工作需求的平行程度。尽管如此,对情绪需求与其他类型的工作需求之间的相互作用影响的初步研究主要集中在与压力相关的担忧和旷工方面的负面结果。本研究调查了与积极结果相关的情绪需求与其他类型的工作需求之间的交互作用。在更大范围的人类服务工作者(社会工作者,n = 725)样本中,调查了情绪需求与其他工作需求(定量需求,工作压力和角色冲突)之间的交互作用,以了解工作的意义和工作质量。假设说,其他工作需求将缓和情绪需求与积极结果之间的关系,因此当其他需求水平较低时,情绪需求将具有正向关系(即,作为挑战),而却具有负向关系(即,挑战)。 ,则成为障碍))。总体而言,结果为情感需求可能成为挑战提供了支持。我们发现,情感需求和工作压力之间(相对于工作的意义)以及情感需求和定量需求,工作压力和角色冲突(相对于工作质量)之间的相互作用很小但很重要。但是,结果并未支持这样的假设,即当其他类型的工作需求水平很高时,情绪需求会成为障碍。总而言之,这些结果有助于表明,当平行工作需求水平较低时,情绪需求可能会提高服务人员的工作态度。我们讨论了研究的贡献和结果的潜在实际意义,并为将来的研究提供了一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号