首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Nutrition >Nutritional Counseling for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing (Chemo) Radiotherapy—A Prospective Randomized Trial
【2h】

Nutritional Counseling for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing (Chemo) Radiotherapy—A Prospective Randomized Trial

机译:接受(化学)放疗的头颈癌患者的营养咨询-一项前瞻性随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Locally advanced head and neck cancer is managed either by combined surgery and (chemo) radiotherapy or definitive (chemo) radiotherapy, which may deteriorate nutritional status. Previous data have shown that intensive nutritional intervention by a dietician reduces radiation-induced adverse events including weight loss.>Objective: To determine if on-demand nutritional counseling (ODC, control group) would be as efficacious as intensive nutritional counseling (INC, experimental group) in patients undergoing (chemo) radiotherapy.>Methods: Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive INC (n = 26) or ODC (n = 32). Outcome measures were nutritional status (PG-SGA), weight loss, handgrip strength (HGS), body composition, and survival.>Results: Weight loss and impaired nutritional parameters during oncological treatment were seen equally in both groups (NS). Leaner patients at baseline maintained their weight, while overweight patients lost both weight and handgrip strength during treatment. Disease-free survival (DFS) (median = 43 months) was not affected by weight loss during treatment. Lower baseline HGS and malnutrition were associated with worse DFS (low vs. normal HGS: 15 vs. 42 months; p = 0.05 and malnutrition vs. good nutrition status: 17 vs. 42 months; p = 0.014, respectively). Survival according to low vs. normal HGS in the INC group was 4 vs. 44 months (p = 0.007) and in the ODC group 28 vs. 40 months (p = 0.944). According to malnutrition vs. good nutritional status in the INC group, DFS was 21 vs. 43 months (p = 0.025) and in the ODC group 15 vs. 41 months (p = 0.03).>Conclusions: As for our primary endpoint, individualized on-demand nutritional counseling was as efficacious as intensive counseling in preventing deterioration of nutritional status and incidence of malnutrition during (chemo) radiotherapy. This should be verified with larger number of patients. Additional findings were that overweight patients had more severe weight loss, but not poorer survival. Low HGS and malnutrition at baseline were associated with poor survival.>Clinical Trial Registration: , identifier .
机译:>背景:局部晚期头颈癌可以通过联合手术和(化学)放疗或确定性(化学)放疗进行治疗,这可能会使营养状况恶化。以前的数据表明,营养师的强化营养干预可减少辐射引起的不良事件,包括减肥。>目的:确定按需营养咨询(ODC,对照组)是否与强化营养治疗一样有效(化学)放疗患者的营养咨询(INC,实验组)。>方法: 58位患者被随机分配接受INC(n = 26)或ODC(n = 32)。结果指标包括营养状况(PG-SGA),体重减轻,握力(HGS),身体成分和存活率。>结果:两组患者在肿瘤治疗期间体重减轻和营养参数受损均相同(NS)。基线时较瘦的患者保持体重,而超重的患者在治疗过程中体重和握力均下降。治疗期间体重减轻不会影响无病生存期(DFS)(中位数= 43个月)。较低的基线HGS和营养不良与较差的DFS相关(低与正常HGS:15与42个月; p = 0.05;营养不良与良好营养状况:17与42个月; p = 0.014)。在INC组中,根据低HGS与正常HGS相比,生存期为4对44个月(p = 0.007),在ODC组中,与28个月相比为40个月(p = 0.944)。根据INC组的营养不良与良好的营养状况,DFS为21 vs. 43个月(p = 0.025),而ODC组为15 vs. 41个月(p = 0.03)。>结论:至于我们的主要终点,个性化按需营养咨询与强化咨询一样有效,可防止(化学)放疗期间营养状况恶化和营养不良发生。这应该在更多的患者中得到验证。其他发现是,超重患者的体重减轻更为严重,但存活率却没有降低。低HGS和营养不良与基线生存率低有关。>临床试验注册:,标识符。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号