首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Genetics >Complimentary Methods for Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Identify New Susceptibility Genes for Blood Cell Traits
【2h】

Complimentary Methods for Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Identify New Susceptibility Genes for Blood Cell Traits

机译:多变量全基因组关联研究的补充方法,鉴定血细胞性状的新易感基因

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found hundreds of novel loci associated with full blood count (FBC) phenotypes. However, most of these studies were performed in a single phenotype framework without putting into consideration the clinical relatedness among traits. In this work, in addition to the standard univariate GWAS, we also use two different multivariate methods to perform the first multiple traits GWAS of FBC traits in ∼7000 individuals from the Ugandan General Population Cohort (GPC). We started by performing the standard univariate GWAS approach. We then performed our first multivariate method, in this approach, we tested for marker associations with 15 FBC traits simultaneously in a multivariate mixed model implemented in GEMMA while accounting for the relatedness of individuals and pedigree structures, as well as population substructure. In this analysis, we provide a framework for the combination of multiple phenotypes in multivariate GWAS analysis and show evidence of multi-collinearity whenever the correlation between traits exceeds the correlation coefficient threshold of r2 >=0.75. This approach identifies two known and one novel loci. In the second multivariate method, we applied principal component analysis (PCA) to the same 15 correlated FBC traits. We then tested for marker associations with each PC in univariate linear mixed models implemented in GEMMA. We show that the FBC composite phenotype as assessed by each PC expresses information that is not completely encapsulated by the individual FBC traits, as this approach identifies three known and five novel loci that were not identified using both the standard univariate and multivariate GWAS methods. Across both multivariate methods, we identified six novel loci. As a proof of concept, both multivariate methods also identified known loci, HBB and ITFG3. The two multivariate methods show that multivariate genotype-phenotype methods increase power and identify novel genotype-phenotype associations not found with the standard univariate GWAS in the same dataset.
机译:全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已发现数百个与全血细胞计数(FBC)表型相关的新型基因座。然而,大多数这些研究是在单一表型框架下进行的,没有考虑到性状之间的临床相关性。在这项工作中,除了标准的单变量GWAS外,我们还使用两种不同的多元方法对来自乌干达总人口队列(GPC)的约7000名个体进行FBC性状的第一个多重性状GWAS。我们首先执行标准的单变量GWAS方法。然后,我们执行了我们的第一个多变量方法,在这种方法中,我们在GEMMA中实施的多变量混合模型中同时测试了具有15个FBC性状的标记关联,同时考虑了个体和血统结构以及人群子结构的相关性。在此分析中,我们为多变量GWAS分析中的多个表型的组合提供了框架,并且当性状之间的相关性超过r 2 > = 0.75的相关系数阈值时,显示了多重共线性的证据。这种方法确定了两个已知和一个新的基因座。在第二种多元方法中,我们将主成分分析(PCA)应用于相同的15个相关FBC性状。然后,我们在GEMMA中实施的单变量线性混合模型中测试了与每个PC的标记关联。我们显示,由每台PC评估的FBC复合表型表达的信息并未完全被单个FBC性状封装,因为这种方法可以识别使用标准单变量和多变量GWAS方法都无法识别的三个已知基因座和五个新颖基因座。在这两种多元方法中,我们确定了六个新基因座。作为概念的证明,这两种多变量方法也都鉴定了已知的基因座,HBB和ITFG3。两种多变量方法表明,多变量基因型-表型方法可提高功效并鉴定在同一数据集中未通过标准单变量GWAS找到的新型基因型-表型关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号