首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Hazards of chemical weapons release during war: new perspectives.
【2h】

Hazards of chemical weapons release during war: new perspectives.

机译:战争期间释放化学武器的危害:新观点。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The two major threat classes of chemical weapons are mustard gas and the nerve agents, and this has not changed in over 50 years. Both types are commonly called gases, but they are actually liquids that are not remarkably volatile. These agents were designed specifically to harm people by any route of exposure and to be effective at low doses. Mustard gas was used in World War I, and the nerve agents were developed shortly before, during, and after World War II. Our perception of the potency of chemical weapons has changed, as well as our concern over potential effects of prolonged exposures to low doses and potential target populations that include women and children. Many of the toxicologic studies and human toxicity estimates for both mustard and nerve agents were designed for the purpose of quickly developing maximal casualties in the least sensitive male soldier. The "toxicity" of the chemical weapons has not changed, but our perception of "toxicity" has.
机译:化学武器的两个主要威胁类别是芥子气和神经毒剂,并且在过去的50多年中这种状况没有改变。两种类型通常称为气体,但实际上它们是挥发性不明显的液体。这些药物是专门设计用来通过任何暴露途径伤害人的,并在低剂量时有效。第一次世界大战中使用芥子气,第二次世界大战之前,之中和之后不久就发展了神经毒气。我们对化学武器效力的认识已经改变,并且我们对长期暴露于低剂量的潜在影响以及包括妇女和儿童在内的潜在目标人群的关注也发生了变化。芥子油和神经毒剂的许多毒理学研究和人体毒性估计都是为了在最不敏感的男性士兵中迅速发展最大伤亡人数而设计的。化学武器的“毒性”没有改变,但是我们对“毒性”的看法却有所改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号