首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >On the different worlds of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices
【2h】

On the different worlds of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices

机译:在组织内知识管理的不同世界上:了解跨国公司跨站点知识共享实践中的特质变异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This qualitative field study investigated cross-site knowledge sharing in a small sample of multinational corporations in three different MNC business contexts (global, multidomestic, transnational). The results disclose heterogeneous “worlds” of MNC knowledge sharing, ultimately raising the question as to whether the whole concept of MNC knowledge sharing covers a sufficiently unitary phenomenon to be meaningful. We derive a non-exhaustive typology of MNC knowledge-sharing practices: self-organizing knowledge sharing, technocratic knowledge sharing, and best practice knowledge sharing. Despite its limitations, this typology helps to elucidate a number of issues, including the latent conflict between two disparate theories of MNC knowledge sharing, namely “sender–receiver” and “social learning” theories (). More generally, we develop the term “knowledge contextualization” to highlight the way that firm-specific organizational features pre-define which knowledge is considered to be of special relevance for intra-organizational sharing.
机译:这项定性的现场研究调查了在三个不同的跨国公司业务环境(全球,多国,跨国)中一小部分跨国公司的跨站点知识共享。结果揭示了MNC知识共享的异构“世界”,最终引发了一个问题,即MNC知识共享的整个概念是否包含足够有意义的统一现象。我们得出了跨国公司知识共享实践的一种非详尽的类型:自组织知识共享,技术官僚知识共享和最佳实践知识共享。尽管存在局限性,但这种类型有助于阐明许多问题,包括两种不同的MNC知识共享理论(即“发送者-接收者”理论和“社会学习”理论)之间的潜在冲突()。更笼统地说,我们发展术语“知识语境化”以强调公司特定的组织特征预先定义哪些知识被认为与组织内共享特别相关的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号