首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >The impact of a lay counselor led collaborative care intervention for common mental disorders in public and private primary care: A qualitative evaluation nested in the MANAS trial in Goa India
【2h】

The impact of a lay counselor led collaborative care intervention for common mental disorders in public and private primary care: A qualitative evaluation nested in the MANAS trial in Goa India

机译:由非专业顾问领导的针对公共和私人初级保健中常见精神障碍的协作治疗干预措施的影响:印度果阿的MANAS试验中进行的定性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The MANAS trial evaluated the effectiveness of a lay counselor led collaborative stepped care intervention for Common Mental Disorders (CMD) in public and private sector primary care settings in Goa, India. This paper describes the qualitative findings of the experience of the intervention and its impact on health and psychosocial outcomes. Twenty four primary care facilities (12 public and private each) were randomized to provide either collaborative stepped care (CSC) or enhanced usual care (EUC) to adults who screen positive for CMDs. Participants were sampled purposively based on two criteria: gender and, in the CSC arm, adherence with the intervention. The qualitative study component involved two semi-structured interviews with participants of both arms (N = 115); the first interview within 2 months of recruitment and the second 6–8 months after recruitment. Data were collected between September 2007 and November 2009. More participants in the CSC than EUC arm reported relief from symptoms and an improvement in social functioning and positive impact on work and activities of daily life. The CSC participants attributed their improvement both to medication received from the doctors and the strategies suggested by the lay Health Counselors (HC). However, two key differences were observed in the results for the two types of facilities. First, the CSC participants in the public sector clinics were more likely to consider the HCs to be an important component of providing care who served as a link between patient and the doctor, provided them skills on stress management and helped in adherence to medication. Second, in the private sector, doctors performed roles similar to those of the HCs and participants in both arms placed much faith in the doctor who acted as a confidante and was perceived to understand the participant's health and context intimately. Lay counselors working in a CSC model have a positive effect on symptomatic relief, social functioning and satisfaction with care in patients with CMD attending primary care clinics although the impact, compared with usual care, is greater in the public sector.
机译:MANAS试验评估了印度果阿的公共和私营部门初级保健机构中由非专业顾问带领的协作式分步护理干预对常见精神障碍(CMD)的有效性。本文描述了干预经验的定性发现及其对健康和社会心理结果的影响。二十四个初级保健机构(每个有12个公立和私立机构)被随机分配,以向筛查CMD阳性的成年人提供协作式阶梯式护理(CSC)或增强型常规护理(EUC)。参与者根据两个标准进行了有目的的抽样:性别,以及在CSC部门中是否坚持干预。定性研究部分涉及两个半参与者的两次半结构化访谈(N = 115);招聘后2个月内进行第一次面试,招聘后2到6个月内进行第二次面试。在2007年9月至2009年11月之间收集了数据。CSC参与者比EUC部门多,他们称其症状得到缓解,社交功能得到改善,并且对日常生活的工作和活动产生了积极影响。 CSC参与者将他们的进步归功于医生提供的药物和非专业健康顾问(HC)提出的策略。但是,在两种类型的设施的结果中观察到两个主要差异。首先,公共部门诊所的CSC参与者更有可能将HC视为提供护理的重要组成部分,将患者与医生联系起来,为他们提供压力管理技能并帮助他们坚持用药。其次,在私营部门中,医生的角色与HC相似,两方的参与者都非常相信扮演红颜知己的医生,并被认为能够深刻了解参与者的健康和背景。在CSC模式下工作的专职辅导员对就诊于初级保健诊所的CMD患者的症状缓解,社会功能和对护理的满意度产生积极影响,尽管与常规护理相比,其影响更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号