首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Bilingualism social cognition and executive functions: A tale of chickens and eggs
【2h】

Bilingualism social cognition and executive functions: A tale of chickens and eggs

机译:双语社会认知和执行功能:鸡和鸡蛋的故事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The influence of bilingualism on cognitive functioning is currently a topic of intense scientific debate. The strongest evidence for a cognitive benefit of bilingualism has been demonstrated in executive functions. However, the causal direction of the relationship remains unclear: does learning other languages improve executive functions or are people with better executive abilities more likely to become bilingual?To address this, we examined 90 male participants of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936; 26 were bilingual, 64 monolingual. All participants underwent an intelligence test at age 11 years and were assessed on a wide range of executive and social cognition tasks at age 74. The only notable differences between both groups were found for the Simon Effect (which indexes stimulus-response conflict resolution; β=−.518, p=0.025) and a trend effect for the Faux Pas task (a measure of complex theory of mind; ToM, β=0.432, p=0.060). Controlling for the influence of childhood intelligence, parental and own social class significantly attenuated the bilingual advantage on the Faux Pas test (β=0.058, p=0.816), whereas the Simon task advantage remained (β=−.589, p=0.049).We find some weak evidence that the relationship between bilingualism and cognitive functions may be selective and bi-directional. Pre-existing cognitive and social class differences from childhood may influence both ToM ability in older age and the likelihood of learning another language; yet, bilingualism does not appear to independently contribute to Faux Pas score. Conversely, learning a second language is related to better conflict processing, irrespective of initial childhood ability or social class.
机译:双语对认知功能的影响目前是激烈的科学辩论的主题。执行功能证明了双语能力的认知优势。然而,这种关系的因果关系仍不清楚:学习其他语言是否会改善执行功能,或者具有更好执行能力的人更可能会双语?为解决这个问题,我们检查了1936年Lothian Birth Cohort的90名男性参与者。双语的有26位,单语的有64位。所有参与者均在11岁时接受了智力测验,并在74岁时接受了广泛的执行和社会认知任务评估。发现两组之间唯一显着的差异是西蒙效应(该指数反映了刺激-反应冲突的解决方法;β =-。518,p = 0.025)和Faux Pas任务的趋势效应(一种复杂的心理理论的度量; ToM,β= 0.432,p = 0.060)。控制儿童智力,父母和自己的社会阶层的影响显着削弱了Faux Pas测验的双语优势(β= 0.058,p = 0.816),而Simon任务优势仍然存在(β=-。589,p = 0.049)我们发现一些薄弱的证据表明双语和认知功能之间的关系可能是选择性的和双向的。童年时代之前存在的认知和社会阶层差异可能会影响老年人的ToM能力以及学习另一种语言的可能性;但是,双语似乎并没有独立地促进Faux Pas评分。相反,学习第二语言与更好的冲突处理有关,而与最初的童年能力或社会阶层无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号