首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >General Practitioners’ Knowledge and Concern about Electromagnetic Fields
【2h】

General Practitioners’ Knowledge and Concern about Electromagnetic Fields

机译:全科医生对电磁场的了解和关注

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Our aim is to explore general practitioners’ (GPs’) knowledge about EMF, and to assess whether different knowledge structures are related to the GPs’ concern about EMF. Random samples were drawn from lists of GPs in Germany in 2008. Knowledge about EMF was assessed by seven items. A latent class analysis was conducted to identify latent structures in GPs’ knowledge. Further, the GPs’ concern about EMF health risk was measured using a score comprising six items. The association between GPs’ concern about EMF and their knowledge was analysed using multiple linear regression. In total 435 (response rate 23.3%) GPs participated in the study. Four groups were identified by the latent class analysis: 43.1% of the GPs gave mainly correct answers; 23.7% of the GPs answered low frequency EMF questions correctly; 19.2% answered only the questions relating EMF with health risks, and 14.0% answered mostly “don’t know”. There was no association between GPs’ latent knowledge classes or between the number of correct answers given by the GPs and their EMF concern, whereas the number of incorrect answers was associated with EMF concern. Greater EMF concern in subjects with more incorrect answers suggests paying particular attention to misconceptions regarding EMF in risk communication.
机译:我们的目的是探索全科医生(GPs)关于EMF的知识,并评估不同的知识结构是否与GPs对EMF的关注有关。随机样本是从2008年德国的GP名单中抽取的。有关EMF的知识由七个项目评估。进行了潜在类别分析,以识别GP知识中的潜在结构。此外,通过使用包含六个项目的评分来衡量GP对EMF健康风险的担忧。使用多元线性回归分析了GP对EMF的关注与他们的知识之间的关联。共有435名(响应率为23.3%)GP参加了该研究。通过潜在类别分析确定了四个组:43.1%的GP给出的答案主要是正确的; 23.7%的GP正确回答了低频EMF问题; 19.2%的人仅回答了有关EMF与健康风险的问题,而14.0%的人大多回答了“不知道”。 GP的潜在知识类别之间或GP给出的正确答案数量与他们的EMF关注之间没有关联,而错误答案的数量与EMF关注有关。对于答案更错误的受试者,人们对EMF的关注程度更高,这表明应特别注意有关风险交流中EMF的误解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号