首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Effect of Manure vs. Fertilizer Inputs on Productivity of Forage Crop Models
【2h】

Effect of Manure vs. Fertilizer Inputs on Productivity of Forage Crop Models

机译:肥料与肥料输入对饲草作物模型生产力的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Manure produced by livestock activity is a dangerous product capable of causing serious environmental pollution. Agronomic management practices on the use of manure may transform the target from a waste to a resource product. Experiments performed on comparison of manure with standard chemical fertilizers (CF) were studied under a double cropping per year regime (alfalfa, model I; Italian ryegrass-corn, model II; barley-seed sorghum, model III; and horse-bean-silage sorghum, model IV). The total amount of manure applied in the annual forage crops of the model II, III and IV was 158, 140 and 80 m3 ha−1, respectively. The manure applied to soil by broadcast and injection procedure provides an amount of nitrogen equal to that supplied by CF. The effect of manure applications on animal feeding production and biochemical soil characteristics was related to the models. The weather condition and manures and CF showed small interaction among treatments. The number of MFU ha−1 of biomass crop gross product produced in autumn and spring sowing models under manure applications was 11,769, 20,525, 11,342, 21,397 in models I through IV, respectively. The reduction of MFU ha−1 under CF ranges from 10.7% to 13.2% those of the manure models. The effect of manure on organic carbon and total nitrogen of topsoil, compared to model I, stressed the parameters as CF whose amount was higher in models II and III than model IV. In term of percentage the organic carbon and total nitrogen of model I and treatment with manure was reduced by about 18.5 and 21.9% in model II and model III and 8.8 and 6.3% in model IV, respectively. Manure management may substitute CF without reducing gross production and sustainability of cropping systems, thus allowing the opportunity to recycle the waste product for animal forage feeding.
机译:牲畜活动产生的肥料是一种危险产品,能够引起严重的环境污染。使用粪便的农艺管理实践可能会将目标从废物转变为资源产品。在每年两次种植的情况下(紫花苜蓿,I型;意大利黑麦草-玉米,II型;大麦种子高粱,III型;以及蚕豆青贮),对将粪肥与标准化学肥料(CF)进行比较的实验进行了研究。高粱,IV型)。 II型,III型和IV型一年生饲草作物的施肥总量分别为158、140和80 m 3 ha -1 。通过撒播和注入程序施于土壤的肥料提供的氮量等于CF提供的氮。施肥对动物饲料生产和生化土壤特性的影响与模型有关。处理之间的天气条件,肥料和CF之间的相互作用很小。 I至IV模型下,在秋肥和春播模型下,施用肥料的生物量作物总产的MFU ha -1 分别为11,769、20,525、11,342、21,397。 CF下MFU ha -1 的减少量为粪肥模型的10.7%至13.2%。与模型I相比,肥料对表层土壤有机碳和总氮的影响强调了作为CF的参数,其在模型II和III中的含量高于模型IV。就百分比而言,模型II和模型III的有机碳和总氮和粪肥处理分别减少了约18.5%和21.9%,模型IV分别减少了8.8和6.3%。粪便管理可以替代CF,而不会降低总产量和耕作系统的可持续性,从而为有机饲料饲喂提供了回收废物的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号