首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Internet Interventions >Process evaluation of a technology-delivered screening and brief intervention for substance use in primary care
【2h】

Process evaluation of a technology-delivered screening and brief intervention for substance use in primary care

机译:技术提供的筛查和对初级保健中药物使用的简短干预的过程评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Psychotherapy process research examines the content of treatment sessions and their association with outcomes in an attempt to better understand the interactions between therapists and clients, and to elucidate mechanisms of behavior change. A similar approach is possible in technology-delivered interventions, which have an interaction process that is always perfectly preserved and rigorously definable. The present study sought to examine the process of participants' interactions with a computer-delivered brief intervention for drug use, from a study comparing computer- and therapist-delivered brief interventions among adults at two primary health care centers in New Mexico. Specifically, we sought to describe the pattern of participants' (N = 178) choices and reactions throughout the computer-delivered brief intervention, and to examine associations between that process and intervention response at 3-month follow-up. Participants were most likely to choose marijuana as the first substance they wished to discuss (n = 114, 64.0%). Most participants indicated that they had not experienced any problems as a result of their drug use (n = 108, 60.7%), but nearly a third of these (n = 32, 29.6%) nevertheless indicated a desire to stop or reduce its use; participants who did report negative consequences were most likely to endorse financial or relationship concerns. However, participant ratings of the importance of change or of the helpfulness of personalized normed feedback were unrelated to changes in substance use frequency. Design of future e-interventions should consider emphasizing possible benefits of quitting rather than the negative consequences of drug use, and—when addressing consequences—should consider focusing on the impacts of substance use on relationship and financial aspects. These findings are an early but important step toward using process evaluation to optimize e-intervention content.
机译:心理疗法过程研究检查了治疗过程的内容及其与结果的关系,以期更好地了解治疗师与服务对象之间的相互作用,并阐明行为改变的机制。在技​​术提供的干预措施中,类似的方法也是可行的,这些干预措施的交互过程始终得到完全保留和严格定义。本研究试图通过比较新墨西哥州两个主要医疗中心成年人在计算机和治疗师之间进行的简短干预措施进行研究的情况,研究参与者与计算机提供的药物滥用简短干预措施之间的互动过程。具体而言,我们试图描述参与者在整个计算机提供的简短干预中的选择(N = 178)的模式和反应,并在3个月的随访中检查该过程与干预反应之间的关联。参与者最有可能选择大麻作为他们希望讨论的第一种物质(n = 114,64.0%)。大多数参与者表示他们没有因吸毒而出现任何问题(n = 108,60.7%),但其中近三分之一(n = 32,29.6%)表示希望停止或减少其使用;确实报告了负面后果的参与者最有可能赞同财务或人际关系方面的担忧。但是,参与者对变化的重要性或个性化规范反馈的有用性的评价与物质使用频率的变化无关。未来电子干预的设计应考虑强调戒烟的潜在好处,而不是毒品使用的负面后果,并且在解决后果时,应考虑将重点放在物质使用对关系和财务方面的影响上。这些发现是使用过程评估来优化电子干预内容的早期但重要的一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号