首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Endodontic Journal >Marginal Adaptation of New Bioceramic Materials and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
【2h】

Marginal Adaptation of New Bioceramic Materials and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study

机译:新的生物陶瓷材料和三氧化二矿骨料的边缘适应性:扫描电子显微镜研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of new bioceramic materials, EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM putty and ERRM paste), to that of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as root-end filling materials.> Materials and Methods: Thirty-six extracted human single-rooted teeth were prepared and obturated with gutta-percha and AH-26 sealer. The roots were resected 3 mm from the apex. Root-end cavities were then prepared with an ultrasonic retrotip. The specimens were divided into three groups (n=12) and filled with MTA, ERRM putty or ERRM paste. Epoxy resin replicas from the resected root-end surfaces and longitudinally sectioned roots were fabricated. The gaps at the material/dentin interface were measured using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Transversal, longitudinal, and overall gap sizes were measured for each specimen. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. >Results: In transversal sections, no significant difference was found between MTA, ERRM putty and ERRM paste (P=0.31). However, in longitudinal sections, larger gaps were evident between ERRM paste and dentinal walls compared to MTA and ERRM putty (P=0.002 and P=0.033, respectively). Considering the overall gap size values, the difference between three tested materials was not statistically significant (P=0.17). >Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, the marginal adaptation of ERRM paste and putty was comparable to that of MTA. However, ERRM putty might be more suitable for filling the root-end cavities because of its superior adaptation compared to ERRM paste in longitudinal sections.
机译:>简介:该研究旨在比较新型生物陶瓷材料EndoSequence根修复材料(ERRM油灰和ERRM糊)与作为根端填充材料的三氧化二矿骨料(MTA)的边际适应性。 >材料和方法:准备了36颗提取的人类单根牙齿,并用牙胶和AH-26封闭剂封闭。将根切离顶点3毫米。然后用超声逆止器制备根端腔。将样品分为三组(n = 12),并填充MTA,ERRM油灰或ERRM糊剂。从切除的根端表面和纵切的根部制造环氧树脂复制品。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)测量材料/牙本质界面处的间隙。测量每个样品的横向,纵向和整体间隙尺寸。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析数据。 >结果:在横向截面中​​,MTA,ERRM腻子和ERRM糊状物之间没有发现显着差异(P = 0.31)。但是,在纵截面上,与MTA和ERRM腻子相比,ERRM糊剂和牙本质壁之间的间隙明显更大(分别为P = 0.002和P = 0.033)。考虑到总体间隙尺寸值,三种测试材料之间的差异在统计学上不显着(P = 0.17)。 >结论:在本研究的范围内,ERRM糊和腻子的边缘适应性与MTA相当。但是,ERRM腻子由于在纵向截面上比ERRM糊剂具有更好的适应性,因此可能更适合填充根端腔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号