首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research : IJPR >GC-FID and HPLC-DAD Methods for the Determination of Menadione Sodium Bisulphite Directly and by Converting Menadione Sodium Bisulphite to Menadione in Pharmaceutical Preparation
【2h】

GC-FID and HPLC-DAD Methods for the Determination of Menadione Sodium Bisulphite Directly and by Converting Menadione Sodium Bisulphite to Menadione in Pharmaceutical Preparation

机译:GC-FID和HPLC-DAD法直接测定药物制剂中的甲萘醌亚硫酸氢钠并将其转化为甲萘醌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

was performed in both direct analysis of MSB and analysis of MN by converting MSB to MN with sodium carbonate. GC-FID method was carried out on the HP-5 capillary column GC-FID and HPLC-DAD methods were developed for determination of menadione (MN) and menadione sodium bisulphite (MSB). By means of each method, quantitative analysis of MSB in commercial pharmaceutical using nitrogen gas. HPLC-DAD method was achieved on the reversed phase C8 column by using a mobile phase consisting methanol and water. The calibration curves of GC-FID and HPLC-DAD for both analytes were linear in the same concentration range (0.5–20 μg/mL). Both methods were validated in terms of precision, accuracy, recovery and limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ). Although LOD values of HPLC-DAD method (0.010 μg/mL for MN and 0.005 μg/mL for MSB) is lower than obtained values with GC-FID method (0.04 μg/mL for MN and 0.06 μg/mL for MSB), both methods gave similar and favorable results in terms of precision and accuracy. The Student's t-test was applied to investigate the significant of the different between the results of MSB determination with direct analysis of MSB and analysis of MN by converting MSB to MN by means of GC-FID and HPLC-DAD method in dosage form.
机译:在MSB的直接分析和MN的分析中都通过用碳酸钠将MSB转化为MN进行。在HP-5毛细管柱上进行GC-FID方法GC-FID和HPLC-DAD方法用于测定甲萘醌(MN)和甲萘醌亚硫酸氢钠(MSB)。通过每种方法,使用氮气对商业制药中的MSB进行定量分析。通过使用由甲醇和水组成的流动相,在反相C8色谱柱上实现了HPLC-DAD方法。在相同浓度范围(0.5–20μg/ mL)中,两种分析物的GC-FID和HPLC-DAD校准曲线均为线性。两种方法均经过了精密度,准确性,回收率和检出限(LOD)和定量(LOQ)验证。尽管HPLC-DAD方法的LOD值(MN为0.010μg/ mL,MSB为0.005μg/ mL)低于GC-FID方法获得的值(MN为0.04μg/ mL,MSB为0.06μg/ mL),但两者这些方法在精度和准确性方面给出了相似且有利的结果。通过学生t检验,通过剂型GC-FID和HPLC-DAD方法将MSB转化为MN,直接研究MSB的MSB测定结果与MN分析之间的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号