首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ISRN Neurology >Phonological Fluency Strategy of Switching Differentiates Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients
【2h】

Phonological Fluency Strategy of Switching Differentiates Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients

机译:转换区分复发缓解型和继发进行性多发性硬化症患者的语音流畅策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The strategies used to perform a verbal fluency task appear to be reflective of cognitive abilities necessary for successful daily functioning. In the present study, we explored potential differences in verbal fluency strategies (switching and clustering) used to maximize word production by patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) versus patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We further assessed impairment rates and potential differences in the sensitivity and specificity of phonological versus semantic verbal fluency tasks in discriminating between those with a diagnosis of MS and healthy adults. We found that the overall rate of impaired verbal fluency in our MS sample was consistent with that in other studies. However, we found no differences between types of MS (SPMS, RRMS), on semantic or phonological fluency word production, or the strategies used to maximize semantic fluency. In contrast, we found that the number of switches differed significantly in the phonological fluency task between the SPMS and RRMS subtypes. The clinical utility of semantic versus phonological fluency in discriminating MS patients from healthy controls did not indicate any significant differences. Further, the strategies used to maximize performance did not differentiate MS subgroups or MS patients from healthy controls.
机译:用于执行口头流利任务的策略似乎反映了成功完成日常工作所必需的认知能力。在本研究中,我们探讨了复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者与继发性进行性多发性硬化症(SPMS)患者用于最大程度地产生单词的言语流畅性策略(切换和聚类)之间的潜在差异。我们进一步评估了语音识别和语义口语流利度任务的敏感性和特异性方面的损伤率和潜在差异,以区分那些诊断为MS和健康成年人的患者。我们发现,我们MS样本中口语流利度的总体降低速度与其他研究结果一致。但是,我们发现在语义或语音流利性单词生成或用于最大化语义流利性的策略方面,MS类型(SPMS,RRMS)之间没有差异。相反,我们发现,在SPMS和RRMS亚型之间的语音流畅性任务中,开关的数量差异很大。语义与语音流利度在区分MS患者与健康对照方面的临床效用并未显示任何显着差异。此外,用于最大化性能的策略并未将MS亚组或MS患者与健康对照区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号