首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Israel Journal of Health Policy Research >Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money
【2h】

Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money

机译:应该为哪些卫生技术提供资金?明确基于物有所值的优先排序框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundDeciding which health technologies to fund involves confronting some of the most difficult choices in medicine. As for other countries, the Israeli health system is faced each year with having to make these difficult decisions. The Public National Advisory Committee, known as ‘the Basket Committee’, selects new technologies for the basic list of health care that all Israelis are entitled to access, known as the ‘health basket’. We introduce a framework for health technology prioritization based explicitly on value for money that enables the main variables considered by decision-makers to be explicitly included. Although the framework’s exposition is in terms of the Basket Committee selecting new technologies for Israel’s health basket, we believe that the framework would also work well for other countries.
机译:背景技术决定要资助的卫生技术涉及医学上一些最困难的选择。至于其他国家,以色列的卫生系统每年都必须做出这些困难的决定。全国公共咨询委员会(称为“篮子委员会”)为所有以色列人有权获得的基本医疗保健清单选择新技术,称为“医疗篮子”。我们引入了一个明确地基于物有所值的卫生技术优先排序框架,该框架使决策者考虑的主要变量得以明确包括在内。尽管该框架的说明是根据篮子委员会为以色列的医疗篮子选择新技术而进行的,但我们认为该框架在其他国家/地区也同样适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号