首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis >Behavior analysis in consumer affairs: Retail and consumer response to publicizing food price information
【2h】

Behavior analysis in consumer affairs: Retail and consumer response to publicizing food price information

机译:消费者事务中的行为分析:零售和消费者对公开食品价格信息的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A popular program among consumer action groups involves publicizing comparative food price information (CFPI) gathered from retail stores. Its significance is based on the assumption that publishing CFPI maximizes retail competition (i.e., moderates price levels or price increases) and occasions more frugal store selections among consumers. We tested these assumptions during a 2-year analysis. Specifically, we monitored the prices of two distinct market baskets in the supermarkets of two midwestern cities (target and contrast cities). Following a lengthy baseline, we published the prices of only one of the market baskets at stores in the target city in the local newspaper on five different occasions. The results suggested that reductions in price inflation occurred for both market baskets at the independently operated target stores. The corporate chain stores were not similarly affected. In addition, surveys indicated that many consumers used the CFPI as a basis for store selection. Finally, the analysis included a discussion of the politics, economics, and future of CFPI programs.
机译:消费者行动组织中的一项受欢迎的计划包括宣传从零售商店收集的比较食品价格信息(CFPI)。其重要性是基于这样的假设,即发布CFPI可最大程度地提高零售竞争(即适度降低价格水平或提价),并在消费者中带来更多节俭的商店选择。我们在为期2年的分析中检验了这些假设。具体来说,我们监控了两个中西部城市(目标城市和对比城市)的超市中两个不同市场篮子的价格。按照漫长的基准,我们在五种不同的情况下仅在目标报纸的目标城市的商店中发布了一个市场篮子的价格。结果表明,在独立运营的目标商店中,两个市场篮子的价格通胀均出现了下降。企业连锁店也没有受到类似的影响。此外,调查表明,许多消费者使用CFPI作为选择商店的基础。最后,分析包括对CFPI计划的政治,经济学和未来的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号