首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis >A multiple change score comparison of traditional and behavioral college teaching procedures
【2h】

A multiple change score comparison of traditional and behavioral college teaching procedures

机译:传统与行为大学教学程序的多元变化评分比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Seventy-six students in a college-level course in human development were divided into an experimental and a control group of approximately equal size. Both groups were given a pretest composed of fill-in and multiple-choice items. The control group was exposed to conventional educational practices while the experimental group was treated in a manner similar to that described by Johnston and Pennypacker (1971), performing only on fill-in items. Post-test results showed significantly greater changes in the experimental group, regardless of the type of test item, although the difference was greater in the case of the fill-in items. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for both future research and tactics in the development of improved teaching technologies.
机译:在人类发展大学课程中的76名学生被分为大小相等的实验组和对照组。两组都接受了由填空题和多项选择题组成的预测试。对照组接受常规的教育实践,而实验组的处理方式类似于Johnston和Pennypacker(1971)所述的方式,仅对填写的项目进行处理。测试后的结果显示,无论测试项目的类型如何,实验组的变化都明显更大,尽管在填写项目的情况下差异更大。讨论了其结果对改进教学技术发展中未来研究和策略的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号