首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrition Journal >Inappropriate statistical method in a parallel-group randomized controlled trial results in unsubstantiated conclusions
【2h】

Inappropriate statistical method in a parallel-group randomized controlled trial results in unsubstantiated conclusions

机译:平行组随机对照试验中不适当的统计方法得出结论不足的结论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The conclusions of Cassani et al. in the January 2015 issue of Nutrition Journal (doi:10.1186/1475-2891-14-5) cannot be substantiated by the analysis reported nor by the data themselves. The authors ascribed the observed decrease in inflammatory markers to the components of flaxseed and based their conclusions on within-group comparisons made between the final and the baseline measurements separately in each arm of the randomized controlled trial. However, this is an improper approach and the conclusions of the paper are invalid. A correct analysis of the data shows no such effects.
机译:卡萨尼等人的结论。营养报告(doi:10.1186 / 1475-2891-14-5)的2015年1月号中的内容不能通过所报告的分析或数据本身来证实。作者将观察到的炎症标记物减少归因于亚麻籽的成分,并基于随机对照试验各组分别在最终和基线测量值之间进行的组内比较得出结论。但是,这是不正确的方法,本文的结论无效。数据的正确分析表明没有这种影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号