首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Functional Biomaterials >Comparison of Various Surface Treatment Procedures on the Roughness and Susceptibility to Staining of Provisional Prosthodontic Materials
【2h】

Comparison of Various Surface Treatment Procedures on the Roughness and Susceptibility to Staining of Provisional Prosthodontic Materials

机译:各种表面处理程序对临时修复材料粗糙度和染色敏感性的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Esthetically pleasing temporary prostheses are often necessary for extended periods in a variety of clinical scenarios. Adjustments to the occlusion or margins are commonly needed before cementing the temporary prosthesis. Therefore, it is clinically necessary to repolish the rough surface to avoid biological and esthetic issues associated with rough surfaces. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the impact of various polishing protocols on the surface roughness and color stability of three resin materials used for provisional crowns. A total of 150 specimens were fabricated from auto-polymerizing polymethyl methacrylate, bis-acryl composite, and Methyl methacrylate-LC resin using a stainless steel mold. Each material group was divided into five groups (n = 10) based on the applied surface treatment: positive control group (G1): no roughening or surface treatment, Negative control group (G2): acrylic bur-roughened surface without any polishing, the different surface treatment groups of silicon carbide and aluminum oxide stone polishing (G3), diamond-coated rubber twist (G4), and Surface Glaze (G5). An optical profilometer was used to assess the surface roughness of all samples. After undergoing 6000 cycles of thermocycling followed by immersion in a coffee solution for 15 days at 37 °C, color parameters were measured using a spectrophotometer both before and after a storage period to evaluate color differences. A two-way ANOVA test with α = 0.05 significance level was carried out to determine the impacts of both the materials utilized and the polishing protocol. Among the three types of resin examined, the bisacryl group exhibited superior surface quality in positive control groups, while PMMA resin demonstrated higher polishability. The diamond-coated rubber twits resulted in lower Ra values of 0.36 (0.01) µm, 0.52 (0.11) µm, and 0.28 (0.05) µm for PMMA, BAMA, and MMLC resins, respectively. The application of photo-polymerized surface glaze led to a plaque accumulation threshold of 0.2 µm across all resin groups. The greatest mean color change occurred in the negative control group, indicating a propensity for more staining on rougher surfaces. The Bisacryl resin exhibited higher ΔE values, whereas PMMA showed better color stability. The lowest ΔE values were found when the surface glaze was applied to all of the provisional crown resins. Untreated Bisacryl resin exhibited the lowest Ra values, while PMMA resins demonstrated superior surface morphology after polishing. PMMA provisional crown resins showed increased resistance to staining. The use of surface glaze enhanced both smoothness and color stability on the surfaces.
机译:在各种临床情况下,美观的临时假体通常需要长时间使用。在粘合临时修复体之前,通常需要调整咬合或边缘。因此,临床上有必要重新抛光粗糙的表面,以避免与粗糙表面相关的生物和美学问题。这项体外研究的目的是评估和比较各种抛光方案对用于临时牙冠的三种树脂材料的表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响。使用不锈钢模具,由自聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、双丙烯酸酯复合材料和甲基丙烯酸甲酯-LC 树脂制备了总共 150 个样品。根据应用的表面处理,将每个材料组分为五组 (n = 10):阳性对照组 (G1):无粗糙化或表面处理,阴性对照组 (G2):无任何抛光的丙烯酸毛刺粗糙表面,碳化硅和氧化铝石抛光 (G3)、金刚石涂层橡胶扭曲 (G4) 和表面釉 (G5) 的不同表面处理组。使用光学轮廓仪评估所有样品的表面粗糙度。在经历 6000 次热循环循环,然后在 37 °C 下浸泡在咖啡溶液中 15 天后,在储存期前后使用分光光度计测量颜色参数,以评估色差。α = 0 的双向方差分析检验。进行 05 显著性水平以确定所用材料和抛光方案的影响。在检查的三种树脂中,双丙烯酸组在阳性对照组中表现出优异的表面质量,而 PMMA 树脂表现出更高的抛光性。金刚石涂层橡胶的 twits 导致 PMMA、BAMA 和 MMLC 树脂的 Ra 值分别降低至 0.36 (0.01) μm、0.52 (0.11) μm 和 0.28 (0.05) μm。光聚合表面釉的应用导致所有树脂组的斑块积累阈值为 0.2 μm。阴性对照组的平均颜色变化最大,表明在较粗糙的表面上有更多染色的倾向。Bisacryl 树脂表现出更高的 ΔE 值,而 PMMA 表现出更好的颜色稳定性。当将表面釉料应用于所有临时冠状树脂时,发现最低的 ΔE 值。未处理的 Bisacryl 树脂表现出最低的 Ra 值,而 PMMA 树脂在抛光后表现出优异的表面形态。PMMA 临时牙冠树脂显示出更高的抗染色性。表面釉料的使用增强了表面的光滑度和颜色稳定性。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号