首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Cancer >Efficacy of Cabazitaxel Treatment in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer in Second and Later Lines. An Experience from Two German Centers
【2h】

Efficacy of Cabazitaxel Treatment in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer in Second and Later Lines. An Experience from Two German Centers

机译:卡巴他赛治疗在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌中的疗效。来自两个德国中心的经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: Several new treatment options for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been approved within the last years - among them cabazitaxel (CAB), abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and radium-223. The aim of this study was to assess factors predictive for efficacy of CAB.>Methods: We analyzed all patients with mCRPC treated with CAB at our institutions between 2011 and 2016. Data were retrieved retrospectively from the electronical patient chart.>Results: 69 patients received CAB (26.1% 2nd line, 36.2% 3rd line, 37.3% >3rd line). Median overall survival (OS) on CAB was 10.0 months (95%CI 7.1-12.9). Median progression free survival (PFS) on CAB was 3.9 months (95%CI 3.0-4.8). There were no differences in OS and PFS regarding treatment line of CAB (2nd vs. higher; 2nd/3rd vs. higher). Duration of remission on 1st line treatment (> 6 months vs. </= 6 months) was associated with a longer PFS with subsequent CAB treatment (4.1 months vs. 3.0 months (95%CI 3.0-5.2; 2.2-3.8); p=0.021). Patients with visceral metastases had a shorter PFS (3.0 months; 95%CI 2.6-3.3) and OS (8.7 months; 95%CI 5.9-11.5) on CAB compared to patients who had bone and/or lymph node lesions only (PFS: 5.8 months; 95%CI 3.2-8.4; p=0.014; OS: 11.7 months; 95%CI 7.5-15.9; p=0.042).>Conclusions: Results from our patient cohort suggest that a longer PFS to any 1st line treatment for mCRPC is correlated with a longer PFS to CAB for any later line treatment. Patients with nodal and bone metastases only had a significantly superior PFS and OS with CAB treatment than patients with visceral metastases.
机译:>目的:在过去几年中,已经批准了针对转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的几种新治疗选择,其中包括卡巴他赛(CAB),醋酸阿比特龙,恩杂鲁胺和镭223。这项研究的目的是评估可预测CAB疗效的因素。>方法:我们分析了2011年至2016年间我们机构中所有接受CAB治疗的mCRPC患者。回顾性地从电子患者图表中检索数据。>结果:患者接受CAB(26.1%2 nd 行,36.2%3 rd 行,37.3%> 3 rd < / sup>行)。 CAB的中位总体生存期(OS)为10.0个月(95%CI 7.1-12.9)。 CAB的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为3.9个月(95%CI 3.0-4.8)。 CAB的治疗线在OS和PFS方面无差异(2 nd 与更高; 2 nd / 3 rd 与更高) 。 1 st 线治疗的缓解时间(> 6个月vs. 结论:我们患者队列的结果提示,PFS较长对任何1 st 行mCRPC的治疗都与更长的PFS相对于CAB进行任何后续行处理有关。淋巴结转移和骨转移的患者仅CAB治疗的PFS和OS明显优于内脏转移的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号