首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research >Comparison of the patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and angioplasty procedures using trans-radial and trans-femoral access
【2h】

Comparison of the patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and angioplasty procedures using trans-radial and trans-femoral access

机译:使用经radi动脉和经股动脉入路比较冠状动脉造影和血管成形术过程中患者的放射线暴露

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Cardiac catheterization procedure through the trans-radial access (TRA) have shown many clinical advantages over the trans-femoral (TFA), but despite its advantages, there are serious concerns regarding higher possible radiation dose for the patients and operators in TRA. This study was planned to compare the patients’ radiation dose associated with TRA and TFA during coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). >Methods: Of 700 candidates for angiography, 326 patients were entered the study. All the procedures were carried out by one interventional cardiologist employing the same angiography unit in Aalinasab hospital and the patients’ dose area product (DAP), air kerma (AK), fluoroscopy time (FT) and cine film time (CFT) were then determined in both access groups (TRA,TFA) in CA, PTCA and CA+PTCA procedures. >Results: The mean FT, CFT and AK values in both TRA & TFA groups were the same in all procedures (P>0.05). The mean DAP in CA+PTCA procedures was 6704.01±3243.23 µGym2 in femoral access compare with 5647.46±2797.74 µGym2 in radial access, which were significantly less than that in TFA with P= 0.02. >Conclusion: On the basis of the results obtained in this study, no differences were found in patients’ radiation dose in both access groups, therefore with regard to comparatively more clinical advantages associated with the Trans-radial access technique it might be a good substitute for Trans-femoral access.
机译:>简介:与经股动脉(TFA)相比,通过the动脉入路(TRA)进行的心脏导管插入术已显示出许多临床优势,但尽管如此,仍存在着对更高剂量的放射剂量的担忧。 TRA中的患者和操作员。计划进行这项研究,以比较患者在冠状动脉造影(CA)和经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)期间与TRA和TFA相关的放射剂量。 >方法:在700位进行血管造影的候选人中,有326名患者进入了研究。所有程序均由一位在Aalinasab医院使用同一血管造影设备的介入心脏病学家执行,然后确定患者的剂量面积乘积(DAP),空气比释动能(AK),荧光检查时间(FT)和电影胶片时间(CFT)在CA,PTCA和CA + PTCA程序的两个访问组(TRA,TFA)中。 >结果:TRA和TFA组的平均FT,CFT和AK值在所有过程中均相同(P> 0.05)。 CA + PTCA术中股骨入路平均DAP为6704.01±3243.23 µGym 2 ,而radial骨入路为5647.46±2797.74 µGym 2 显着低于TFA P = 0.02。 >结论:根据这项研究获得的结果,在两个通路组中患者的放射剂量均未发现差异,因此,与经-动脉通路技术相关的相对较多的临床优势它可能是经股骨入路的良好替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号