首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioinformation >Comparison of five different obturation approaches for resistance against fracture in root canal treated teeth
【2h】

Comparison of five different obturation approaches for resistance against fracture in root canal treated teeth

机译:五种不同闭塞方法对根管治疗牙齿抗骨折的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Endodontist should know about the fracture resistance of endodontic treated teeth in different obturation techniques to make a proper choice for obturation of mechano-chemically prepared root canals. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically obturated teeth in five different obturation techniques namely single cone obturation (SCO), cold lateral compaction (CLC), cold free flow condensation, warm vertical compaction, injection molded thermo-plasticized technique. Among experimental categories, maximum fracture resistance was observed in cold free flow condensation technique while minimum fracture resistance was observed in injection molded thermo-plasticized technique. Cold free flow condensation technique using Gutta Flow2 has the potential to be used as obturation technique with minimum fracture resistance. Conventional techniques like CLC and SOC also offered good fracture resistance.
机译:牙髓病医生应该了解牙髓治疗过的牙齿在不同缝合技术下的抗断裂性,以便正确选择机械化学制备的根管缝合。因此,比较五种不同的闭塞技术,即单锥充填 (SCO)、冷侧向压实 (CLC)、冷自由流冷凝、温垂直压实、注塑成型热塑性技术,对牙髓充填牙齿的抗断裂性是有意义的。在实验类别中,在冷自由流动冷凝技术中观察到最大的抗断裂性,而在注射成型的热塑性技术中观察到最小的抗断裂性。使用 Gutta Flow2 的无冷流冷凝技术有可能用作抗断裂性最小的充填技术。CLC 和 SOC 等传统技术也具有良好的抗断裂性。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号