首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioscience >Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science
【2h】

Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science

机译:公民沉默:错失公民科学的机会

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Citizen science is personal. Participation is contingent on the citizens’ connection to a topic or to interpersonal relationships meaningful to them. But from the peer-reviewed literature, scientists appear to have an acquisitive data-centered relationship with citizens. This has spurred ethical and pragmatic criticisms of extractive relationships with citizen scientists. We suggest five practical steps to shift citizen-science research from extractive to relational, reorienting the research process and providing reciprocal benefits to researchers and citizen scientists. By virtue of their interests and experience within their local environments, citizen scientists have expertise that, if engaged, can improve research methods and product design decisions. To boost the value of scientific outputs to society and participants, citizen-science research teams should rethink how they engage and value volunteers.
机译:公民科学是个人的。参与取决于公民与对他们有意义的话题或人际关系的联系。但从同行评议的文献来看,科学家似乎与公民之间存在着一种以数据为中心的获取性关系。这引发了对与公民科学家的采掘关系的道德和务实批评。我们建议五个实际步骤,将公民科学研究从提取性转变为关系性,重新定位研究过程,并为研究人员和公民科学家提供互惠互利。凭借他们对当地环境的兴趣和经验,公民科学家拥有专业知识,如果参与其中,可以改进研究方法和产品设计决策。为了提高科学成果对社会和参与者的价值,公民科学研究团队应该重新思考他们如何吸引和重视志愿者。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号