首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Laparoendoscopic Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A >Perioperative Cost Differences Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Institutional Review
【2h】

Perioperative Cost Differences Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Institutional Review

机译:腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的围手术期成本差异:单一机构评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Minimizing bariatric surgery care costs is important since more than 250,000 patients undergo bariatric surgery annually in the United States. The study objective was to compare perioperative costs for the two most common bariatric procedures: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). In addition, we sought to identify predictors of high-cost perioperative care.Methods: Adult patients who underwent LSG or LRYGB from 2012 to 2017 were identified using our institutional bariatric surgery database. Perioperative costs, defined as costs incurred from the time of entering the preoperative unit until exiting the postanesthesia care unit, were obtained through billing data. Median perioperative cost components of LSG and LRYGB were compared using Mann–Whitney tests. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate patient-level predictors of high-cost care, defined as the top tercile of perioperative costs.Results: We included 546 bariatric surgery patients with a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 49.7 years and 45.9 kg/m2, respectively. There were no significant differences in median perioperative costs between LSG and LRYGB ($14,942 versus $15,016; P = .80). Stapler use was the largest cost contributor for both procedures, accounting for 27.7% and 29.2% of costs for LSG and LRYGB, respectively. In multivariable analyses, preoperative patient characteristics, including BMI, were not associated with high-cost perioperative care.Conclusions: Perioperative costs for LSG and LRYGB were similar in our single institution study. Reducing costs outside of the operating room, including those related to ED visits and complications, may be more impactful than focusing on cost reduction directly related to perioperative care.
机译:背景:最大限度地减少减肥手术护理费用很重要,因为美国每年有超过 250,000 名患者接受减肥手术。研究目的是比较两种最常见的减肥手术的围手术期费用: 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 (LSG) 和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 (LRYGB)。此外,我们试图确定高成本围手术期护理的预测因子。方法: 使用我们的机构减肥手术数据库确定 2012 年至 2017 年接受 LSG 或 LRYGB 的成年患者。围手术期费用,定义为从进入术前病房到离开麻醉后监护病房所发生的费用,是通过计费数据获得的。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验比较 LSG 和 LRYGB 的中位围手术期成本成分。进行多变量 logistic 回归以研究患者水平的高成本护理预测因子,定义为围手术期成本的前三分之一。结果: 我们纳入了 546 例减肥手术患者,平均年龄和体重指数 (BMI) 分别为 49.7 岁和 45.9 kg/m2。LSG 和 LRYGB 之间的围手术期中位费用没有显著差异(14,942 美元对 15,016 美元;P = .80)。吻合器的使用是两种手术的最大成本贡献者,分别占 LSG 和 LRYGB 成本的 27.7% 和 29.2%。在多变量分析中,术前患者特征(包括 BMI)与高成本的围手术期护理无关。结论: 在我们的单一机构研究中,LSG 和 LRYGB 的围手术期成本相似。减少手术室外的费用,包括与 ED 就诊和并发症相关的费用,可能比专注于降低与围手术期护理直接相关的费用更有影响力。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号