首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Standard protocols for plant health scientific assessments
【2h】

Standard protocols for plant health scientific assessments

机译:植物健康科学评估的标准方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In accordance with the EFSA Strategy 2027 outlining the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH Panel) developed standard protocols to harmonise the problem formulation process and outputs for mandates addressing recurrent scientific questions. Three types of recurring EFSA plant health mandates require generic scientific assessments: (i) pest categorisation; (ii) commodity risk assessment for the purpose of derogation to provisions of the EU plant health law and (iii) quantitative pest risk assessment. The three standard protocols are tailored to the appropriate level of detail and build on the existing guidance documents laying out the methods for conducting risk assessment in the plant health domain. To develop a standard protocol for pest categorisation, the PLH Panel adapted the latest version of the standard template reporting the evidence needs and the assessment questions to conclude whether a pest fulfils the criteria for being considered a potential quarantine pest for the EU. To develop a standard protocol for commodity risk assessment, the PLH Panel adapted the procedure and standard templates used for commodity risk assessment of high risk plants. To develop a standard protocol for quantitative pest risk assessments (qPRA), the Panel reviewed the existing guidance document on qPRA and the qPRAs published by the PLH Panel. The hierarchy of assessment questions and sub‐questions used were identified and extracted. Based on this, a hierarchically organised IT‐tool was formulated as protocol for the planning and documentation of future qPRAs.
机译:根据 EFSA 2027 年战略概述了 EFSA 通用科学评估的适用方案的必要性,EFSA 植物健康小组 (PLH Panel) 制定了标准协议,以协调问题制定过程和解决反复出现的科学问题的任务的产出。三种类型的重复性 EFSA 植物健康要求需要通用的科学评估:(i) 有害生物分类;(ii) 商品风险评估,旨在减损欧盟植物健康法的规定,以及 (iii) 有害生物风险评估。这三个标准协议是根据适当的详细程度量身定制的,并建立在现有的指导文件的基础上,这些文件规定了在植物健康领域进行风险评估的方法。为了制定有害生物分类的标准方案,PLH 小组调整了最新版本的标准模板,报告了证据需求和评估问题,以得出有害生物是否符合欧盟被视为潜在检疫性有害生物的标准。为了制定商品风险评估的标准方案,PLH 小组采用了用于高风险植物商品风险评估的程序和标准模板。为了制定定量有害生物风险评估 (qPRA) 的标准方案,小组审查了 PLH 小组发布的关于 qPRA 和 qPRA 的现有指导文件。确定并提取使用的评估问题和子问题的层次结构。基于此,制定了一个分层组织的 IT 工具,作为未来 qPRA 的规划和记录协议。
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号