首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >An Evaluation of the Factors Affecting ‘Poacher’ Detection with Drones and the Efficacy of Machine-Learning for Detection
【2h】

An Evaluation of the Factors Affecting ‘Poacher’ Detection with Drones and the Efficacy of Machine-Learning for Detection

机译:影响Poacher检测的因素的评价及机器学习检测的功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Drones are being increasingly used in conservation to tackle the illegal poaching of animals. An important aspect of using drones for this purpose is establishing the technological and the environmental factors that increase the chances of success when detecting poachers. Recent studies focused on investigating these factors, and this research builds upon this as well as exploring the efficacy of machine-learning for automated detection. In an experimental setting with voluntary test subjects, various factors were tested for their effect on detection probability: camera type (visible spectrum, RGB, and thermal infrared, TIR), time of day, camera angle, canopy density, and walking/stationary test subjects. The drone footage was analysed both manually by volunteers and through automated detection software. A generalised linear model with a logit link function was used to statistically analyse the data for both types of analysis. The findings concluded that using a TIR camera improved detection probability, particularly at dawn and with a 90° camera angle. An oblique angle was more effective during RGB flights, and walking/stationary test subjects did not influence detection with both cameras. Probability of detection decreased with increasing vegetation cover. Machine-learning software had a successful detection probability of 0.558, however, it produced nearly five times more false positives than manual analysis. Manual analysis, however, produced 2.5 times more false negatives than automated detection. Despite manual analysis producing more true positive detections than automated detection in this study, the automated software gives promising, successful results, and the advantages of automated methods over manual analysis make it a promising tool with the potential to be successfully incorporated into anti-poaching strategies.
机译:无人机越来越多地用于保护动物的非法偷猎。为此目的使用无人机的一个重要方面是建立在检测偷猎者时增加成功机会的技术和环境因素。最近的研究致力于调查这些因素,这项研究建立在这方面以及探索机器学习实现自动检测的功效。在具有自愿测试受试者的实验环境中,测试各种因素对检测概率的影响:相机型(可见光谱,RGB和热红外,TIR),一天的时间,相机角度,冠层密度和行走/固定测试主题。通过志愿者手动分析无人机镜头,并通过自动检测软件进行分析。具有Logit Link函数的广义线性模型用于统计分析两种类型分析的数据。结果结论,使用TIR相机改善了检测概率,特别是在黎明和90°摄像头角度。在RGB航班期间,倾斜角度更有效,步行/固定式测试受试者没有用两种相机探测。随着植被覆盖的增加,检测概率降低。机器学习软件具有0.558的成功检测概率,然而,它产生比手动分析更大的误报近五倍。然而,手动分析生产比自动检测更虚假的底层2.5倍。尽管手动分析产生了比本研究中的自动化检测更真实的阳性检测,但自动化软件提供了有希望的,成功的结果,以及自动化方法对手动分析的优点使其成为有前途的工具,有可能成功融入反偷猎策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号