首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Comparison Study of the Histomorphometric Results after Socket Preservation with PRF and Allograft Used for Socket Preservation—Randomized Controlled Trials
【2h】

Comparison Study of the Histomorphometric Results after Socket Preservation with PRF and Allograft Used for Socket Preservation—Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:PRF与同种异体移植术中的组织素质术后的比较研究用于套接字保存 - 随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present clinical study was to assess and compare the histomorphometric results and efficacy of freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in combination with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and PRF as a sole grafting material for socket preservation. Ninety patients in need of tooth extraction and implant restoration were included in this study. The participants were randomly divided into three groups based on post-extraction clinical protocol: socket preservation procedure with allograft in combination with a PRF membrane (PRFm), PRF as a sole grafting material, and a control group. A total of 90 implants were placed four months post-extraction. During the surgical re-entry a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Histological samples were prepared and analyzed for percentage vital bone and connective tissue. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis were used to assess the results. Both test groups revealed a significantly higher percentage of vital bone formation compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences regarding vital bone formation and connective tissue quantity between the tested groups were observed (FDBA + PRFm: 3.29 ± 13.03%; and PRF: 60.79 ± 9.72%). From a clinical and histological point of view, both materials in the test groups are suitable for the filling of post-extraction sockets without bone defects. Both of the tested groups revealed a significantly higher percentage of vital bone formation compared to the control group.
机译:本临床研究的目的是评估和比较冷冻干燥骨同种异体移植(FDBA)与富含血小板的纤维蛋白(PRF)的组合结果和功效,以及PRF作为用于插座保存的鞋底嫁接材料。本研究纳入了需要牙齿提取和植入物修复的九十患者。将参与者随机分为三组,基于提取后临床方案:插座保存程序与同种异体移植物结合PRF膜(PRFM),PRF作为鞋底接枝材料,以及对照组。在提取后共半的90个植入物。在手术过程中,再加入骨骼活组织检查用三芬钻头收获。制备组织学样品并分析百分比生命骨和结缔组织。使用Bonferroni后HOC分析的单向ANOVA用于评估结果。与对照组相比,两种测试组揭示了百分比的重要骨形成百分比。观察到(FDBA + PRFm:3.29±13.03%;及PRF:60.79±9.72%)关于所测试的组之间的重要的骨形成和结缔组织数量没有统计学显著差异。从临床和组织学的角度来看,测试组中的两种材料适合于填充没有骨缺陷的提取后插座。与对照组相比,两种测试组揭示了显着较高的重要骨形成百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号