首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
【2h】

Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study

机译:呼出 - 呼吸呼吸测试在患有后手术综合征患者脊髓刺激期间使用电子鼻子:实验试验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The increased awareness of discrepancies between self-reporting outcome measurements and objective outcome measurements within the field of neuromodulation has accelerated the search towards more objective measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can differentiate between chronic pain patients in whom Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) was activated versus deactivated. Twenty-seven patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) participated in this prospective pilot study. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath were measured with electronic nose technology (Aeonose™) during SCS on and off states. Random forest was used with a leave-10%-out cross-validation method to determine accuracy of discriminating between SCS on and off states. Our random forest showed an accuracy of 0.56, with an area under the curve of 0.62, a sensitivity of 62% (95% CI: 41–79%) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI: 30–70%). Pain intensity scores were significantly different between both SCS states. Our findings indicate that we cannot discriminate between SCS off and on states based on exhaled breath with the Aeonose™ in patients with FBSS. In clinical practice, these findings imply that with a noninvasive electronic nose, exhaled breath cannot be used as an additional marker of the effect of neuromodulation.
机译:增加的自我报告结果的测量和神经调节领域内的客观测量结果之间的差异的意识,加速朝着更加客观测量搜索。这项研究的目的是评估电子鼻是否能在其中脊髓刺激(SCS)被激活与停用慢性疼痛患者进行区分。 27例患者有手术失败综合征(FBSS)参加了这项前瞻性试验研究。呼出气体中的挥发性有机化合物进行开和关状态SCS期间与电子鼻技术(Aeonose™)测量。随机森林用免洗型10%使用-out交叉验证方法来确定开和关状态之间SCS鉴别的准确度。我们的随机森林显示出0.56的精度,面积的0.62的曲线下,62%(95%CI:41-79%)的灵敏度和50%(95%CI:30-70%)具有特异性。疼痛强度评分均SCS状态之间显著不同。我们的研究结果表明,我们可以关闭并基于呼出气与Aeonose™患者FBSS状态SCS之间没有歧视。在临床实践中,这些发现意味着,与非侵入式电子鼻,呼出气不能被用作神经调节的作用的另外的标记物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号