首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Foods >Use of Wild Edible Plants: Can They Meet the Dietary and Nutritional Needs of Indigenous Communities in Central India
【2h】

Use of Wild Edible Plants: Can They Meet the Dietary and Nutritional Needs of Indigenous Communities in Central India

机译:使用野生食用植物:它们可以满足印度中部土着社区的饮食和营养需求吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite significant evidence base on quantifying ecosystem services, the role of biodiversity in supporting such services in diversified landscapes, and how indigenous communities exploit, utilize and manage plant resources in a biocultural regime, remains understudied. This study examines the role of wild edible plants (WEPs) in meeting the food, nutrition and household income of indigenous communities under the biodiversity rich landscape of the Achanakmaar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve (AABR—22°15′ to 22°58′ N latitudes and 81°25′ to 82°5′ East longitudes) of Central India. Results revealed remarkable differences among Baiga, Gond, Kol, and Oraon ethnic communities and also location (core, buffer and transition) effect on utilization pattern of wild edibles. A sum total of 172 WEPs comprising 60 vegetables, 70 fruits, seeds and nuts, 23 underground tubers and 19 mushrooms were collected, consumed, and surplus were marketed by the communities. On average, the number of wild edibles collected annually by households were in the following quantities: 40–240 kg leafy vegetables, 125–386 kg flowers, 120–250 kg fruits, 12–125 kg legumes, 24–120 kg tubers, 5–35 kg mushrooms. Among ethnic groups, the Baiga primitive community utilized 70–90% followed by Gonds (58–81%), Kols (52–78%), Oraons (43–79%), and other communities (38–68%) in different zones. WEPs have contributed to 5–24% (Rs 3559- 12,710) of household income, which was highest in the core zone and lowest in the transition zone. It was observed that WEPs were complemented the diets rather than being a substitute for staple foods. They supplied only 3.7–8.3% of energy and 1.1–4.9% protein requirements; however, they significantly supplemented ascorbic acid, thiamine, calcium, and iron by 38.1–73%, 13.7–35.4%, 17.2–29.1%, 2.6–13.5%, respectively. Significantly higher quantities of nutrients were supplemented in the core zone compared to other zones. WEPs were currently underutilized (less intake) especially in buffer and transition zones, complementing the staple foods and partially supplementing the essential macro- and micro-nutrients. However, these have the potential to fulfill the dietary needs and ensure balanced nutrition, if consumed in recommended portions and sizes. The paper discusses policy implications that ensure coherence and coordination of local indigenous communities for conservation and sustainable utilization of WEPs of AABR, Central India.
机译:尽管有重大的证据基础,但量化生态系统服务,生物多样性在支持多元化景观中的这种服务,以及土着社区如何利用,利用和管理生物文化制度的植物资源,仍然被解读。本研究探讨了野生食用植物(WEPS)在富川崎亚马克拉达州生物圈储备(AABR-22°15'至22°58'N)景观下的生物多样性富景观下的土着社区的食品,营养和家庭收入的作用印度中部的81°25'至82°5'到82°5''东纵向)。结果揭示了Baiga,Gond,Kol和奥森族群社区的显着差异,以及对利用模式的利用模式的位置(核心,缓冲和转变)。 172种WEPS包含60种蔬菜,70个果实,种子和螺母,23个地下块茎和19个蘑菇,被社区销售,消耗,盈余和盈余。平均而言,每年由家庭收集的野生食品的数量有以下数量:40-240公斤植物蔬菜,125-386公斤花,120-250公斤果实,12-125千克豆类,24-120千克块茎,5 -35千克蘑菇。在族群中,Baiga原始群落利用70-90%,随后用70-90%(58-81%),KOL(52-78%),oraons(43-79%)和其他社区(38-68%)不同区域。 WEPS已促使家庭收入的5-24%(RS 3559-12,710),在核心区中最高,过渡带最低。观察到WEPS补充了饮食,而不是成为主食食品的替代品。它们仅提供3.7-8.3%的能量和1.1-4.9%的蛋白质要求;然而,它们显着补充了抗坏血酸,硫胺素,钙和熨斗,分别为38.1-73%,分别为13.7-35.4%,17.2-29.1%,2.6-13.5%。与其他区域相比,在核心区中补充了核心区的显着较高的营养素。 WEPS目前未充分利用(减少摄入量),特别是在缓冲和过渡区,补充主食和部分补充基本的宏观和微营养。然而,如果在推荐的部分和尺寸下消耗,这些有可能达到膳食需求并确保均衡的营养。本文讨论了确保局部土着社区的一致性和协调,印度中部AABR的威斯卫生保障和可持续利用的一致性和协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号