首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry >Full arch fixed prostheses vs. full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses both supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients: Results at 15 years
【2h】

Full arch fixed prostheses vs. full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses both supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients: Results at 15 years

机译:牙周治疗患者的全牙弓固定假体与全牙弓可伸缩保留的假体同时由植入物和天然牙基牙支持:15年的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe clinical outcome of full arch fixed prostheses vs. full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients has been reported by few studies, with controversial results. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term (15 years) complications of abutment teeth and dental implants in periodontally treated patients, rehabilitated with full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses (TRP)s vs. full arch fixed prostheses (FP)s supported by teeth and implants.
机译:背景很少有研究报道了在牙周治疗患者中使用全牙弓固定假体与使用牙种植体和天然牙基牙支持的全牙弓可伸缩保留的可修复假体的临床结果,结果存在争议。这项研究的目的是评估经牙弓固定保留可修复假体(TRP)与固定牙弓(FP)修复的牙周治疗患者的基牙和种植牙的长期(15年)并发症由牙齿和植入物支撑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号