首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
【2h】

A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population

机译:农村人口腹股沟疝的改良Bassini修补术和Lichtenstein网格修补术(LMR)的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Bassini’s repair and the Lichtenstein’s tension free mesh hernioplasty are commonly used hernia repair techniques and yet there is no unison as to which is the best technique. Our hospital being in a rural setup and catering to majority of poor patients who are daily wagers, open hernia repairs are commonly done. This study was undertaken to compare the technique and post-operative course so as to determine the best suitable of the two procedures for them.>Materials and Methods: A comparative randomized study was conducted on a total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia and were operated upon by either of technique and followed up. Outcome of both the techniques were analyzed and compared with other similar studies.>Results: Study involved 35 each of Modified Bassini’s Repair (MBR) and Lichtenstein’s Mesh Repair (LMR), over a period of 18 months. MBR took more operating time than LMR. Commonest complication in both the groups was seroma formation. There were two recurrences in the MBR group and none in LMR group.>Conclusion: LMR was comparatively better than MBR due to its simplicity, less dissection and early ambulation in the post-operative period and with no recurrence, in our study.
机译:>背景:Bassini的修复和Lichtenstein的无张力网状疝修补术是常用的疝气修复技术,但是,哪种技术是最好的却并不一致。我们的医院位于农村,可以满足大多数贫困患者的日常需求,通常会进行开放性疝气修补术。进行这项研究以比较技术和术后过程,以确定最适合这两种手术的方法。>材料和方法:总共对70例患者进行了比较随机研究腹股沟疝并通过任何一种技术进行手术并进行随访。对这两种技术的结果进行了分析,并与其他类似研究进行了比较。>结果:研究在18个月的时间里分别进行了35个改良的Bassini修复(MBR)和利希滕斯坦的网格修复(LMR)。 MBR比LMR花费更多的操作时间。两组中最常见的并发症是血清肿形成。 MBR组有2例复发,而LMR组无1例。>结论: LMR手术简单,解剖少,术后早期移动且无复发,相对于MBR相对更好,在我们的研究中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号