首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Perspectives on Medical Education >Are we generating more assessments without added value? Surgical trainees’ perceptions of and receptiveness to cross-specialty assessment
【2h】

Are we generating more assessments without added value? Surgical trainees’ perceptions of and receptiveness to cross-specialty assessment

机译:我们是否在没有附加价值的情况下产生更多的评估?外科学员的看法和接受的跨专业评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Competency-based medical education (CBME) hinges on robust assessment. However, integrating regular workplace-based assessment within demanding and sometimes chaotic clinical environments remains challenging. Many faculty lack assessment expertise, and some programs lack the infrastructure and faculty numbers to fulfill CBME’s mandate. Recognizing this, we designed and implemented an assessment innovation that trains and deploys a cadre of faculty to assess in specialties outside their own. Specifically, we explored trainees’ perceptions of and receptiveness to this novel assessment approach.
机译:基于能力的医学教育(CBME)铰链在稳健的评估中。然而,在苛刻的情况下整合基于工作场所的评估,有时混乱的临床环境仍然具有挑战性。许多教师缺乏评估专业知识,一些方案缺乏履行CBME任务的基础设施和教师。认识到这一点,我们设计并实施了一项评估创新,列举并部署了一名教师的干部,以评估自己的特色。具体而言,我们探讨了对这种新型评估方法的学员对和接受的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号