首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety >Structured benefit–risk evaluation for medicinal products: review of quantitative benefit–risk assessment findings in the literature
【2h】

Structured benefit–risk evaluation for medicinal products: review of quantitative benefit–risk assessment findings in the literature

机译:药品效益风险评估:文献中定量益处风险评估结果审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A favorable benefit–risk profile remains an essential requirement for marketing authorization of medicinal drugs and devices. Furthermore, prior subjective, implicit and inconsistent ad hoc benefit–risk assessment methods have rightly evolved towards more systematic, explicit or “structured” approaches. Contemporary structured benefit–risk evaluation aims at providing an objective assessment of the benefit–risk profile of medicinal products and a higher transparency for decision making purposes. The use of a descriptive framework should be the preferred starting point for a structured benefit–risk assessment. In support of more precise assessments, quantitative and semi-quantitative methodologies have been developed and utilized to complement descriptive or qualitative frameworks in order to facilitate the structured evaluation of the benefit–risk profile of medicinal products. In addition, quantitative structured benefit–risk analysis allows integration of patient preference data. Collecting patient perspectives throughout the medical product development process has become increasingly important and key to the regulatory decision-making process. Both industry and regulatory authorities increasingly rely on descriptive structured benefit–risk evaluation and frameworks in drug, vaccine and device evaluation and comparison. Although varied qualitative methods are more commonplace, quantitative approaches have recently been emphasized. However, it is unclear how frequently these quantitative frameworks have been used by pharmaceutical companies to support submission dossiers for drug approvals or to respond to the health authorities’ requests. The objective of this study has been to identify and review, for the first time, currently available, published, structured, quantitative benefit–risk evaluations which may have informed health care professionals and/or payor as well as contributed to decision making purposes in the regulatory setting for drug, vaccine and/or device approval.
机译:有利的益处风险概况仍然是营销药用药物和设备授权的重要要求。此外,先前的主观性,隐含和不一致的临时福利风险评估方法正确地发展为更系统,明确或“结构化”方法。当代结构福利风险评估旨在提供对药品效益风险概况的客观评估,以及决策目的的透明度更高。使用描述性框架的使用应该是结构化益处风险评估的首选起点。为了支持更精确的评估,已经开发出了定量和半定量方法,并利用了补充描述性或定性框架,以便于制定对药品益处风险概况的结构化评价。此外,定量结构效益风险分析允许集成患者偏好数据。在整个医疗产品开发过程中收集患者的观点已经变得越来越重要,监管决策过程的关键。行业和监管机构都越来越依赖于药物,疫苗和设备评估和比较中的描述性结构性福利风险评估和框架。虽然不同的定性方法更加普遍,但最近强调了定量方法。但是,目前尚不清楚这些定量框架已被制药公司使用的频率频率,以支持毒品批准或回应卫生当局要求的提交档案。本研究的目的是识别和审查目前可用,发布,结构化的定量效益 - 风险评估,这些风险评估可能有知情的医疗保健专业人员和/或薪金,以及促成了决策目的药物,疫苗和/或设备批准的监管设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号