首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Orthopaedic Translation >Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of the adjacent segments after minimally invasive cervical surgeries versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element study
【2h】

Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of the adjacent segments after minimally invasive cervical surgeries versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element study

机译:微创宫颈手术后邻近宫颈外切除术和融合后相邻区段生物力学的对比分析及融合:有限元研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Percutaneous full-endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy (PEACD) and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) as alternatives to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are extensively used in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. The possibility of avoiding the risk of accelerated degeneration of the adjacent segments caused by fusion is claimed to be the theoretical advantage of these approaches; however, there is a paucity of supportive evidence from biomechanical data. Therefore, this study investigated and compared the effects of PCF, PEACD, and ACDF on the adjacent segments and operative segments of the cervical spine from a biomechanical standpoint.
机译:经皮全内镜前宫颈椎间盘切除术(PEACD)和后宫内宫颈传染症(PCF)作为前宫颈椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)的替代品被广泛用于治疗宫颈脊髓型无放射病变的患者。避免由融合引起的相邻区段加速退化的可能性被要求是这些方法的理论优势;然而,缺乏生物力学数据的支持性证据。因此,本研究研究并比较了PCF,PEACD和ACDF对来自生物力学观点的颈椎相邻区段和手术区段的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号