首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >The impact of an introductory animal handling course on undergraduate students who lack previous livestock handling experience
【2h】

The impact of an introductory animal handling course on undergraduate students who lack previous livestock handling experience

机译:介绍性动物处理课程对缺乏以前牲畜处理经验的本科生的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A majority of animal science undergraduates have limited livestock handling experience when they come to college. To address this issue, a course based on livestock handling, safety, and welfare was implemented in the Department of Animal Science at Iowa State University. This study aimed to (i) determine whether the course was effective at improving the comfort level of a student while handling livestock and (ii) identify demographic factors that contributed to student performance in the course. The course was delivered as an 8-wk, lecture-laboratory format. Each semester, a precourse survey and precourse exam were administered during the first class period (N = 87). The survey collected self-reported demographic information, prior livestock handling experience, and comfort level by specie. The exam tested the prior knowledge of each student. At the semester conclusion, a postcourse survey and postcourse exam were given to determine whether the course was effective at improving comfort and knowledge levels of each student, respectively (N = 75). Students from farm backgrounds outscored urban students by 5.56 ± 2.96% on the precourse exam (P = 0.06). Cumulative grade point average at the time of the course (GPA) had a role in the preexam score (P = 0.003) while gender, semester, involvement in 4H (cooperative extension program) or Future Farmers of America (FFA), and high school or collegiate judging were not factors in the preexam score (P > 0.10). Background and student rank did not have an effect on the postcourse exam score (P = 0.96 and P = 0.58, respectively). As expected, GPA was significant when fit as a covariate (P < 0.001) in the postcourse exam model. Upon course completion, students reported that their comfort level while handling livestock had increased for all livestock species. The largest increases were observed with poultry (37.8% to 66.9%) and dairy (49.3% to 84.3%). Of the 75 students polled, 96% felt that the hands-on approach was beneficial at reinforcing lecture material, and 100% reported that they were more likely to voluntarily interact with livestock inside or outside of the classroom setting after course completion. In conclusion, some demographic attributes play a role in student performance at the beginning of the course, but these factors are no longer significant after completion of the course. In addition, the level of comfort with and knowledge of livestock handling, safety, and welfare all improved, which shows that the course was successful at achieving the intended learning outcomes.
机译:大多数动物科学本科生在学院时牲畜处理经验有限。为了解决这个问题,在爱荷华州立大学的动物科学系实施了基于畜牧业处理,安全和福利的课程。本研究旨在(i)确定该课程是否有效地改善学生的舒适程度,同时处理牲畜和(ii)识别课程中有助于学生表现的人口因子。该课程被交付为8 WK,讲座实验室格式。每个学期,在第一阶段期间管理先决的调查和先例考试(n = 87)。该调查收集了自我报告的人口统计信息,先前的牲畜处理经验,并通过物种舒适度。考试测试了每个学生的先验知识。在学期结论中,给出了一张过电的调查和过电检查,以确定该课程是否有效地改善每个学生的舒适和知识水平(n = 75)。来自农场背景的学生越来越多的城市学生在先前考试中按5.56±2.96%(P = 0.06)。累计平均成绩在课程(GPA)的时候曾在preexam得分(P = 0.003),而一个角色性别,学期,参与4H(合作推广计划)或美国未来农民(FFA),和高中或大学判断在PREExam评分中不是因素(P> 0.10)。背景和学生排名没有对后期考试评分的影响(P = 0.96和P = 0.58)。正如预期的那样,GPA在经过视网膜检查模型中适合作为协变量(P <0.001)时显着。完成后,学生报告说,他们的舒适程度在处理牲畜的所有牲畜种类上都有增加。用家禽(37.8%至66.9%)和乳制品(49.3%至84.3%)观察到最大的增加。在75名投票的学生中,96%的人认为,动手方法有利于加强讲座材料,100%报道他们更有可能在课程完成后自愿与畜牧业内外的牲畜互动。总之,一些人口统计属性在课程开始时在学生表现中发挥作用,但在课程完成后,这些因素不再重要。此外,牲畜处理,安全和福利的舒适度和知识均有改进,这表明该课程在实现预期的学习成果方面取得了成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号