首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis >Clinical Validation of the Chinese Version of Patient Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Form
【2h】

Clinical Validation of the Chinese Version of Patient Completed Caprini Risk Assessment Form

机译:中文版患者的临床验证完成了Caprini风险评估表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To create and validate patient-completed Caprini risk score (CRS) tools for Chinese people. We revised Chinese patient-completed CRS form according to previously published studies. We prospectively recruited 70 internal medical patients and 70 surgical patients. The average age of these patients was 54.26 ± 15.29 years, 54.29% of them were male and 80% of them had education beyond high school. The study compared: (1) patient-completed CRS and physician-completed CRS; (2) the final value of physician-completed CRS (physician-completed CRS + body mass index) and CRS in the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Patient-completed CRS was 3.71 ± 3.63, patients spent 3.60 ± 1.24 minutes, 57.14% patients were at high-highest risk; physician-completed CRS was 3.84 ± 3.63, physicians spent 2.11 ± 1.13 minutes, 59.28% patients were at high-highest risk; the final value of physician-completed CRS was 4.12 ± 3.62, 63.58% patients were at high-highest risk; CRS value in the EMR system was 4.07 ± 3.58, 65% patients were at high-highest risk. There were strong positive correlations (P < .0001) between patient-completed CRS and physician-completed CRS (r = 0.978, κ = 0.76) and between the final value of physician-completed CRS and CRS in EMR (r = 0.994, κ = 0.97). This study successfully developed and validated a Chinese patient-completed CRS that we found can replace physician-completed CRS. This results in considerable time saving for physicians and this process should increase the percentage of patients having complete risk assessment when they are admitted to the hospital.
机译:为中国人创建和验证患者完成的Caprini风险评分(CRS)工具。根据以前发表的研究,我们修改了中国患者完成的CRS形式。我们潜在招聘了70名内部医疗患者和70例外科患者。这些患者的平均年龄为54.26±15.29岁,其中54.29%是男性,其中80%的人在高中培养。该研究比较:(1)患者完成的CRS和医生完成的CRS; (2)医生完成的CRS(IMERIAN-TREAND CRS +体重指数)的最终价值和电子医疗记录(EMR)系统中的CRS。患者已完成的CRS为3.71±3.63,患者花费3.60±1.24分钟,57.14%的患者风险高。医生完成的CRS为3.84±3.63,医生花费2.11±1.13分钟,59.28%的患者风险高。医生完成的CRS的最终值为4.12±3.62,63.58%的患者风险高。 EMR系统中的CRS值为4.07±3.58,65%的患者风险高65%。患者完成的CRS和医生完成的CRS(r = 0.978,κ= 0.76)之间存在强烈的正相关(P <,01),并且在EMR中的医生完成的CRS和CRS的最终值之间(R = 0.994,κ之间= 0.97)。本研究成功开发并验证了中国患者已完成的CRS,我们发现可以取代医生完成的CRS。这导致医生暂停了相当多的时间,而这一过程应在入院入院时增加具有完全风险评估的患者的百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号