【2h】

Focusing on Places Rather Than Guns

机译:专注于地方而不是枪支

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Firearms-related injuries and deaths represent a major public health issue in the United States. Several researchers and professionals have called for additional research about strategies to mitigate morbidity and mortality associated with firearms.1 In keeping with this recommendation, Moyer et al. (p. 140) recently evaluated the effect of remediating blighted vacant lands on shooting incidents. In this experiment, clusters of blighted vacant lands in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (n = 110), were randomly allocated to one of the following interventions: (1) a greening intervention (including mowing, trash removal, grading the land, planting new grass and trees, and installing wooden fences; n = 37); (2) a less-intensive mowing and trash removal intervention (n = 36); or (3) no intervention (n = 37). Results from difference-in-difference regression models indicated that both interventions were associated with a significant decrease in shootings per month. For instance, the greening and mowing interventions were respectively associated with declines of 6.6% and 8.1% in shootings per square kilometer.
机译:枪械有关的伤害和死亡代表了美国的主要公共卫生问题。几位研究人员和专业人士呼吁关于策略的额外研究,以减轻与枪支有关的发病率和死亡率的策略,以便与本建议书保持联系,Moyer等人。 (第140页)最近评估了修复枯萎的空地对射击事件的影响。在这个实验中,宾夕法尼亚州(N = 110)的费城(N = 110)中的枯萎的空地簇被随机分配给以下干预措施之一:(1)绿化干预(包括割草,种植土地,种植新草,种植新草树木,安装木栅栏; n = 37); (2)较小的割草和垃圾去除干预(n = 36);或(3)无干预(n = 37)。差异差异回归模型的结果表明,两种干预措施都与每月枪击事件的显着减少相关。例如,绿化和割草的干预分别与每平方公里的枪击发作的下降有关的下降6.6%和8.1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号